You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly. You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
The AI hoax claiming God is being built and we're trapped inside it
An unproven message claims an elite is using AI to build a simulated reality. The conversation drifts toward Sumerians, the Antichrist and distrust of financial power.
The AI hoax claiming God is being built and we're trapped inside it
A bold claim: someone asserts that a group of people with economic power is developing an artificial intelligence capable of creating realities, and that we are living inside one of them. The thesis, put forward without evidence, mixes technology, religion and a radical distrust of financial elites. The original message admits it outright: "I have no proof." From there, the conversation drifts toward the Sumerians, the Antichrist and reverse engineering.
What exactly does the message that sparks the controversy say
The initial argument claims that those who control money and artificial intelligence have already grasped the fundamental mechanism of existence, so money has ceased to have value for them. Unlike Europe's search for the God particle in an expensive accelerator, these supposed actors would be "building God." The conclusion is that we are an invention. There is not a single source, fact or document supporting the claim. When asked for proof, the answer is that it cannot be extracted and that everyone must check it for themselves.
Why simulation theory and AI get mixed up with the Sumerians
The conversation branches out quickly. The reference to Sumerian tablets appears, along with powerful beings who supposedly created human beings to work, a story presented as a historical precedent for the idea. There is also the suspicion, voiced without any proof, that Jewish people adapted those stories to serve their financial interests, a generalization that does not hold up. Another thread introduces the coming of the Antichrist and an announced false messiah. And some reduce it all to a matter of information: we humans would be training data for AIs.
The response from the one asking for data and the one laughing it off
Skepticism runs through much of the replies. Someone asks directly for evidence, and another jokes that the revelation puts his mind at ease. One message sums up the general bewilderment: "I don't know who I am, I don't know what the purpose of life is, I don't know what consciousness is." Against that, the author of the original message insists that her brain cannot understand such a thing through reason and proposes Jesus as a hacker of reality. The conversation reaches no consensus: it moves between mockery, curiosity and mystical adherence.
The economic backdrop nobody disputes
Beyond the esoteric component, there lies a distrust of financial and technological power. George Soros is mentioned along with his visits to Moncloa (the Spanish Prime Minister's official residence), and news items are linked about his son and his support for migration policies. It is the only stretch with verifiable facts, though they are used to fuel a general suspicion about who is really pulling the strings. The conclusion drawn is that AI would not be just another tool, but the instrument with which a diffuse elite intends to replace reality. None of that has been proven.
With all this in hand, the cautious prediction is that the simulation narrative will keep growing, fueled by every advance in artificial intelligence. Lack of proof has never stopped a good theory.
Summary of a discussion on Burbuja.info - Foro de economía, actualidad y política., translated from Spanish and reviewed before publication.
Read the full discussion (51 replies).
Analysis of Pedro Sánchez's announced press conference. The atmosphere is filled with deep skepticism regarding pending economic and political announcements.
A report presented at a forum puts what Spain's tax agency and Social Security take from the average worker at 21,100 euros a year, close to 54% of the total cost.
Trump said "hundreds of thousands" of "angry" people had entered Spain and tied it to a problem. We examine the quote, its context and its economic reading.