Telefónica sells its Madrid Gran Vía skyscraper for 200 million: bargain price?
Telefónica has sold its building on Madrid's Gran Vía for 200 million despite its 32,000 m². The comparison with the Primark building and planning rules explain the price.
English · Original discussion in Spanish · Published
Telefónica's Gran Vía skyscraper: 200 million that raise eyebrows
The price looks like a gift. But the planning fine print may explain the discount. Telefónica has closed the sale of its building on Madrid's Gran Vía for 200 million euros, a figure that, at first glance, clashes with the 32,000 square metres and 15 floors plus tower that make up the property. The comparison with the sale of the Primark building in 2015 –400 million– sets alarm bells ringing: has the area really depreciated that much, or is something not being told?
The numbers that don't add up
The building, located in the very heart of Madrid, has 32,000 m² and a tower. At 200 million, the price per square metre comes to around 6,250 euros. In a city where a run-down penthouse in Tetuán can cost a million, the figure seems absurd. But there is a key nuance: the property's zoning classification does not allow residential use. It is designated for tertiary use, meaning offices or hotels. And that changes everything.
Current regulations require costly adaptations: fire exits, accessibility, energy efficiency. In old buildings, the expensive part is not buying, it is renovating. It has been suggested that a full refurbishment could exceed 500 million, a figure which, added to the purchase price, means the deal only makes sense for a hotel operator or a fund seeking long-term returns.
The comparison that fuels the debate
The reference to the Primark building, sold for 400 million in 2015, is inevitable. But there are differences: that property had established commercial use and a more privileged location for retail. Telefónica's building, with its tower and its history, carries an added problem: many interior elements are protected, which limits any renovation. It also has no garage, a drawback in an area where traffic and noise make residential life unappealing.
Meanwhile, the question remains in the air. If the buyer is a hotel fund, the price makes sense. If it is a housing developer, we will have to wait for the rules to change. And if no one explains the deal, the suspicion that something doesn't add up will keep feeding the scepticism.
The price looks like a gift. But the planning fine print may explain the discount. Telefónica has closed the sale of its building on Madrid's Gran Vía for 200 million euros, a figure that, at first glance, clashes with the 32,000 square metres and 15 floors plus tower that make up the property. The comparison with the sale of the Primark building in 2015 –400 million– sets alarm bells ringing: has the area really depreciated that much, or is something not being told?
The numbers that don't add up
The building, located in the very heart of Madrid, has 32,000 m² and a tower. At 200 million, the price per square metre comes to around 6,250 euros. In a city where a run-down penthouse in Tetuán can cost a million, the figure seems absurd. But there is a key nuance: the property's zoning classification does not allow residential use. It is designated for tertiary use, meaning offices or hotels. And that changes everything.
Current regulations require costly adaptations: fire exits, accessibility, energy efficiency. In old buildings, the expensive part is not buying, it is renovating. It has been suggested that a full refurbishment could exceed 500 million, a figure which, added to the purchase price, means the deal only makes sense for a hotel operator or a fund seeking long-term returns.
The comparison that fuels the debate
The reference to the Primark building, sold for 400 million in 2015, is inevitable. But there are differences: that property had established commercial use and a more privileged location for retail. Telefónica's building, with its tower and its history, carries an added problem: many interior elements are protected, which limits any renovation. It also has no garage, a drawback in an area where traffic and noise make residential life unappealing.
Meanwhile, the question remains in the air. If the buyer is a hotel fund, the price makes sense. If it is a housing developer, we will have to wait for the rules to change. And if no one explains the deal, the suspicion that something doesn't add up will keep feeding the scepticism.
Summary of a discussion on Burbuja.info - Foro de economía, actualidad y política., translated from Spanish and reviewed before publication. Read the full discussion (19 replies).
More summaries
-
Telefónica sells its historic Gran Vía headquarters in Madrid for 200 million
Telefónica has sold its historic Gran Vía headquarters for 200 million euros to property developer Tomás Olivo. The deal, closed this week, raises questions about the company's liquidity.
-
Telefónica sells its historic Gran Vía headquarters to Tomás Olivo for €200 million
Telefónica has completed the sale of its historic Gran Vía headquarters to Tomás Olivo for €200 million. The building is a Madrid icon.
-
Riots in French schools: fires and attacks
Fires in French schools, teachers attacked and blockades spreading to Belgium. The unrest is attributed to the education strike and radical groups.
-
The State takes €43,000 from a €180,000 property sale
From a flat sold for €180,000, the Spanish State collects €43,000 in taxes while the seller keeps barely €20,000 in profit. Who is really speculating?
-
Santaolalla poses in T-shirt honouring 7291 care home victims in Spain
Spanish commentator Sarah Santaolalla poses in a T-shirt reading 7291, the number of care home victims in Madrid, reigniting the row over the political use of tragedy.
-
Cádiz robbery reignites debate over lethal force in Spain
A bank robber died in Cádiz after a gunshot to the leg severed his femoral artery, while the wounded officer survived thanks to his bulletproof vest. The debate over…