Tech worker says people are hostile to him because his wife cares for the baby

An X user argues that if the vvife stays at home, the split of household chores and baby care should not be 50/50. He raises it while living a double life: he works in tech and hides his republican views.

The post is brief and straight to the point: someone whose vvife stays at home should not split housework and baby care 50/50. The author throws it out as a surprise, almost as a rebuke to those who think otherwise. He gives no names, figures, or examples. Just a conviction about how a couple should organize itself when one of the two has no paid job.

## The argument for an unequal split

The underlying idea is that housework and child-rearing are an occupation. If one person takes it on full-time, demanding that they also do half of the other's tasks sounds, in that logic, like doubling the load. The poster doesn't go into nuances: he doesn't talk about schedules, children with special needs, or one-off arrangements. He presents the 50/50 as a dogma he finds striking.

## A confession about the workplace

On the same account, the author describes himself as working at a tech company and says he constantly lies about his ideology. He claims nobody knows he is a republican, that he is Baptist, or that he reads Plato. It's a detail that adds context: he speaks from a sector he perceives as hostile to his ideas. That doesn't validate his thesis on the split, but it explains the tone of someone who feels like a minority in his environment.

## What the underlying debate leaves out

The post doesn't mention income, working hours, or the economic value of care. It doesn't distinguish between specific tasks and mental load either. These are relevant absences because any serious conversation about the division of housework ends up there. The author limits himself to an intuition about everyday fairness, with no data to back it up.