Supreme Court Suspends Voting Rights Granted by Grandchildren Law
The Supreme Court's decision to accept the precautionary measure requested by Iustitia Europa and Vox has created a paradox: new citizens under the Grandchildren Law maintain their nationality, but they cannot exercise their vote until their origin is proven. In practice, this suspends the effects of registration in the Electoral Census of Residents.
What exactly does this suspension imply?
The measure does not annul the granted nationalities, but rather orders a case-by-case review of the antecedent's origin. Those who cannot prove they descend from a victim of a specific province will be excluded from the electoral census if they do not reside in Spain. The obvious goal: preventing hundreds of thousands of new voters from deciding elections without having set foot in the country.
The fundamental debate
While some maintain that exercising nationality is a right, but voting without paying taxes is not, others view this as an attempt to limit a vote that could change majorities. The discussion extends to the interpretation of the Constitution and whether diaspora members legitimately have a voice in the polls. In any case, the Supreme Court's decision leaves the ball in the couriers' court, which must audit every file.
The question remains whether this suspension will be definitive or if Congress will pass a law guaranteeing the vote to these new citizens. One thing is certain: the fight has only just begun.
Summary of a discussion on Burbuja.info - Foro de economía, actualidad y política., translated from Spanish and reviewed before publication.
Read the full discussion (22 replies).
The discussion surrounding the grandchildren's law points to up to 2.3 million potential voters who could choose their electoral district without any real ties.
An ABC column criticizes the government for tackling housing with two decrees without guaranteed parliamentary approval and at the cost of reducing supply.