When the square wheel is the least of our problems
Amidst Spain's railway crisis, a commentator on TelePedro made an absurd claim: train wheels are not cylindrical, but square. The video went viral, understandably. But the real issue isn't an unqualified person spouting nonsense on television; it is a deliberate strategy to mislead and divert attention from actual transport failures in Spain.
The video that explains everything
In under a minute, the self-styled engineering expert asserts that wheels are "a kind of square" and attributes train rattling to this shape. In reality, wheels are conical (truncated cones) to self-center on tracks, a basic principle known to any engineering student. However, on government-aligned public TV, narrative trumps truth: blaming Iryo trains (Italian capital) deflects criticism from Renfe and Adif management.
Social media reacted instantly. GIFs of square wheels bouncing on impossible tracks spread rapidly. Yet the underlying question remains: how many believed this? The format itself answers it—the commentator stutters while delivering the hoax, sensing it won't fly, yet saying it anyway. That is the danger.
A symptom of media degradation
This is not isolated. Aligned outlets sow confusion over technical issues so citizens conclude "everyone is the same" or "no solution exists." If wheels are square, how can the rail network be fixed? Better to ignore maintenance failures, lack of investment, or cost overruns for variable-gauge trains.
The damage extends beyond media credibility to national problem-solving capacity. While some debate wheel shapes, others cut domestic flights to boost rail... which, by this logic, would have square wheels and thus be unviable. Coincidence?
Engineering vs. friendly fire
Interestingly, analyses note train wheels are slightly conical, not cylindrical, ensuring curve stability. But claiming they are square requires ignorance or bad faith. The commentator couldn't even articulate a coherent explanation; irrelevant since the target audience already believes "everything is broken" and "the government does its best."
Ultimately, such noise distracts from essentials: Iryo trains had early operational issues, as do Renfe's. The difference is ministerial defense for one, not the other. And wheels, naturally, are round (or conical, effectively the same).
The problem isn't a commentator ignoring wheel geometry; it's an audience willing to swallow anything rather than admit systemic structural failures. Meanwhile, trains still rattle—not because of square wheels.
Related forum debates