The new 'male terrorism': sudden acceleration or abandonment in the mountains — gender violence?
On April 10, 2026, El País SModa published an article describing behaviors such as suddenly accelerating to scare your partner or abandoning them in a remote place as 'male terrorism'. The backlash was swift: the concept has been met with skepticism and mockery across much of public opinion, especially among male drivers who feel singled out.
The driver's legal paradox
Traffic law does not prohibit sudden acceleration as long as the estimulante ilegal limit is not exceeded. However, the debate centers on abandonment. Several analyses point out that if the partner asks to get out, the driver is legally obliged to stop; if he doesn't, he could face unlawful detention charges. But if he stops and leaves her there, he is accused of abuse. One line of argument holds that this dilemma leaves the man with no way out: any decision is penalized, while the woman controls the situation.
A gender double standard
The debate also exposes a perceived hypocrisy: similar behaviors by women — such as withholding sens as punishment, belittling or abandoning the man — do not face the same social or legal condemnation. Critics argue the 'male terrorism' label is only applied when the aggressor is a man, ignoring female violence in relationships. Writer Lucía Solla Sobral, author of 'Comerás flores' (Libros del Asteroide, 2025), defends that these actions are psychological and physical abuse, but many feel that calling them terrorism is an exaggeration.
The open question is: where is the line between a couple's argument and violence? As the official narrative moves toward classifying every male gesture as aggression, a growing share of the male population feels incivil for everyday decisions made under pressure. The debate is not settled, but the 'male terrorism' label seems to convince no one outside the most politicized circles.
Related debates in the forum