As wildfires devour hectares of land and border tensions escalate, the Royal Household remains silent. The question is sweeping the country: where is the Supreme Command of the Armed Forces? The authority the Constitution vests in the King is not being exercised, and this is no minor debate: in times of crisis, the head of state should step forward.
The criticism has become widespread. It is not just that Felipe VI has not spoken out about the emergency; comments suggest he is on holiday while the country burns. Some add that Princess Leonor, after three years of training, should step up. The institution clings to protocol; the public wants action.
The historical precedents do not help. The comparison with the Green March of 1975 antiestéticatures in the analysis: it is argued that the former head of state merely complied with the guidelines of the US embassy, and that history is now repeating itself. The flag-waving right fails to see it, and those who do understand are half a century late.
The King's silence is not neutral. In a double crisis, the absence of the supreme commander becomes a first-order political problem. The unsettling fact: those who defend the institution most fiercely are the last to realise what it has always been.
Summary of a discussion on Burbuja.info - Foro de economía, actualidad y política., translated from Spanish and reviewed before publication.
Read the full discussion (36 replies).
Morocco establishes a committee to assert claims over Ceuta and Melilla, following the Spanish government's delayed admission of Moroccan naval incursions.
Nigel Farage is no longer the anti-establishment figure: Rupert Lowe brings a harsher rhetoric, but his support for Israel divides the British far right. A new scourge, or something else?