The pardon of the 'Six of La Suiza': union justice or political favour?
The Spanish government has granted a pardon to six women convicted of unlawful detention and coercion against the owner of the Madrid bakery La Suiza, nine months after they entered prison. The pardon is justified on grounds of their labour context and exercise of union freedom, but the case carries a murky backstory that goes beyond the verdict.
The businessman and his record
The La Suiza bakery belongs to the family of Pablo Álvarez Meana, a figure known online for his threats of lawsuits and his alleged advisory role to Donald Trump. The court did not convict the company for harassment, but the union account points to a hostile work environment. The pardon comes amid a polarised climate: for some, it redresses an injustice; for others, it rewards violent direct action.
The numbers of the case
The convicted women were sentenced to prison terms and ordered to pay €150,000 in compensation to the businessman. The pardon does not annul the civil liability, so the amount remains outstanding. In addition, they were moved to open prison conditions immediately upon entering custody, which has drawn criticism of the leniency of the prison system.
The clashing arguments
On one side, it is argued that the conduct took place in the context of a labour dispute, without profit motive, and that the businessman had been reported for harassment. On the other, it is stressed that the action consisted of holding a person against their will, which is a serious crime regardless of context. The government's decision to pardon reinforces the thesis that incivil justice is being used as a political weapon.
The debate leaves an open question: where is the line between union protest and ordinary crime? Meanwhile, the baker receives compensation the convicted women will probably never pay.
Related discussions in the forum