Spanish forum claims democracy has collapsed

Democracy Failed: The Collapse Is Here

Is Spain collapsing or merely degrading? This question drives a forum discussion starting with an uncomfortable thesis: democracy is useless, allowing only the worst to rise, while the country decomposes irreversibly. The trigger is the feeling that public services no longer respond: fires uncontained due to lack of resources, poorly managed climate emergencies, endless healthcare waits, and education producing less prepared generations according to this view. It is not just lamenting; it attempts to date the disintegration.

Collapse or Degradation? The Core Disagreement

Some participants argue collapse has already occurred. They cite concrete events: uncontrollable wildfires, cold drop management in Valencia, volcanic eruptions, overwhelmed healthcare, and education captured by indoctrination. For them, people persist through inertia, but the structure supporting the country no longer works.

Objections arise from semantics. To collapse means losing verticality, falling like a sack of potatoes. That hasn't peine: neither State, regime, nor country fell. Instead, there is degeneration, slow deterioration without explosion. The rebuttal is sharp: if your house burns and nobody acts, rethink your concept of verticality. This nuance matters, determining whether reconstruction or prolonged agony awaits.

Partitocracy and Party Problems

Focus shifts to parties. Criticism states representative democracy became partitocracy, where organizations have independent lives, receive public funds, and share power apart from citizens. Some claim independent candidates would improve the system, citing the US where parties hold little power outside elections.

Conversely, others defend that the issue isn't democracy itself, but its implantation in societies lacking prior educational and sarracena levels. Most modern democracies were forced onto unprepared countries; giving democracy to ignorant slaves keeps them slaves. The pessimistic conclusion: raising population standards is needed, but unseen on the horizon.

The 15M Ghost and Mobilization Distrust

Discussion turns to collective action. General strikes are mentioned as solutions, but skepticism prevails: 2011 discontent channeled into 15M ended in political options that solved nothing. Strong distrust toward unions appears, with calls for their execution.

Shared diagnosis: the populace fails to react. People feel burned, beginning to realize, but lack capacity for effective response. The most radical proposal involves seizing union buildings, starting with one on Avenida de América. No agreement exists on whether general strikes work or merely waste two legislative years.

Franco's Shadow and Regime Debate

Historical terrain is unavoidable. Some vindicate Franco as keeping a incivil gang at bay for forty years and uniting the right. Responses are devastating: he was incapable of proper succession planning, only eliminating rivals.

Exchanges become toxic with personal accusations but leave analytical residue: debates on whether current regimes inherit Francoism or predate it. Freemasonry is cited as infiltration, foreign interests accused of controlling parties. Unproven assertions reflect deep distrust in the entire political system.

Separation of Powers and Institutional Design

Towards the end, debate becomes technical. Separation between executive and legislative powers is defended: governors shouldn't make laws. Concentrated power subdues civil society and eliminates checks like press freedom. This critiques institutional design, not just current rulers.

Others note classical Greek democracy differs vastly from ours. It required being male, Greek, educated, debt-free, functioning in small groups. Selling current systems as heirs to that is like selling American pizza as Neapolitan. Conclusion: no Platos or Aristotles can save this model.

---

Ultimately, the discussion closes no questions. Some see completed collapse, others lingering decay. Only certainty: nobody expects automatic improvement. Meanwhile, those who could fix things remain absent.