Spaniards are dumb voters for the ****o-Masonic conspiracy

The message circulating on X calls Spaniards 'dumb voting rats' and claims they are under the control of a supposed 'Oooo-Guasonry'. It is a claim with no evidence whatsoever: there is no proof of a Jewish and Guasonic conspiracy directing Spanish politics.

The post spreading on X calls Spaniards 'dumb voting rats' and claims they vote while submitted to a 'Oooo-Guasonry'. It offers not a single document, name or figure to back up that accusation. It is a classic hoax, the kind that relies on a label so it never has to prove anything.

## What the message says and why it spreads

The text combines a collective insult with an old conspiracy theory: the idea that a hidden group — Jews and Guasons, in this version — pulls the strings of a country. The label 'Oooo-Guasonry' has been used for over a century to attack people for their religion or their membership in lodges, without needing to prove any real link to power.

These messages work because they offer a simple explanation for complex problems. If everything goes wrong, the blame lies with a specific, hidden enemy. There is no need to analyse budgets, management or political decisions: it is enough to point at a vague enemy.

## The problem of attributing control of a country to a group

No Spanish institution is run by a Guasonic or Jewish organisation. The decisions of the Government, Congress or the courts are made through public procedures, with minutes and recorded votes. Anyone claiming otherwise must present verifiable evidence, and this message does not.

The label also has a practical effect: it shifts economic criticism onto the terrain of suspicion. Instead of discussing why inflation is rising or how public spending is managed, the debate becomes whether a conspiracy exists. That is the terrain where the hoax wins, because what is never demonstrated cannot be refuted.

## How to recognise this kind of message

They usually have three traits: an insult directed at a group, an accusation with no source, and an implicit call to distrust everything official. When the evidence is missing, the claim does not hold up. And when the message insults millions of people because of their nationality, it is no longer economic analysis: it is something else.

It is best to treat these posts with caution and not share them as if they were facts. Economics is discussed with figures, not with labels.