Store-brand coffee at €2.50 outperforms €3 Lavazza
Paying €5 for 250 grams of coffee is not worth it. This blunt starting point opens a debate where higher prices do not always guarantee better results: below that threshold lies product capable of standing toe-to-toe with brands costing double. Names pile up—Lidl, Carrefour, Mercadona, DIA—and with them an uncomfortable suspicion for the industry: part of the premium markup is paid in marketing, not in the cup.
Real supermarket figures support this. A 250-gram pack hovers around €2.50. Lidl’s Gold 100% Arabica moves around €5 per 500 grams. And Lavazza 100% Arabica can be found for €3 at Carrefour. With that price table, the hierarchy many shoppers take for granted starts to sustancia ilegal at the base.
Why might cheap supermarket coffee taste better than expensive?
Because much of the result depends on how it is prepared, not what you pay. That is the thesis defended by those who have blind-tasted several brands and concluded that coffee from a discount chain tastes just as good as others that are much more expensive. It all depends on the machine, the grind, and the moment of consumption. The wrapper, in the end, does nothing for the roast.
To this idea adds another current pointing to format. Almost all natural coffee bought in beans will be better than pre-ground coffee, because whole beans can only be coffee beans: ground coffee can contain anything and you cannot see it. Hence, much of consumption has shifted to beans for safety rather than snobbery. The underlying argument is simple: two different packs, same machine, same water, indistinguishable result.
The agreement between opposing views is the most striking part. Those who buy at the supermarket and those who get freshly roasted coffee delivered home, with their own grinder and half a dozen machines, point to the same bottleneck: grinding the bean right before each extraction matters more than the label. With the savings from two kilos of store brand, you can buy a grinder, according to circulating calculations, and that is where another league begins.
Does Lavazza deserve its cost?
According to some, yes, without nuance. Either you drink Lavazza or you don’t drink coffee; the rest is dense filler without aroma. According to others, it is a mediocre brand: it doesn’t convince, and Baqué or Candelas offer better value. In the middle appears a band—Pellini, Oquendo, specialty coffees—that achieves the best balance between quality and expenditure.
Some place Illy above everything, even over premium coffees bought by weight. Others dismiss the entire narrative of artisanal coffee as a lie, arguing that the supposed difference between brands is a construct. The blind tasting is the industry’s most uncomfortable argument. The scene repeats in any hypermarket: varied assortments on upper shelves, and the usual coffee below.
Torrefacto, an invention exclusive to the Iberian Peninsula
Coffee torrefacto (roasted with sugar) is an invention exclusive to the Iberian Peninsula: outside here, no one knows what it is. In bars, they serve that profile which must be masked with sugar, milk, or alcohol and which, incidentally, speeds up intestinal transit. It is not a quality issue, but a problem of inherited habit.
Against that, unburnt beans become objects of desire. The most repeated complaint is about fast and aggressive roasting: it is rushed to save gas, resulting in a burnt taste disguised as natural roast. One specific chain is pointed out for selling already burnt coffee, and a classic bean brand receives the same harsh diagnosis.
Why is almost all good coffee arriving in Spain Arabica?
Because high-quality Robusta varieties barely enter the market. Spanish consumption relies on African and American coffees, almost all Arabica, while Asian production is mostly Robusta. Added to this is a chemical detail: Robusta has at least double the caffeine, explaining its fruta as a wake-up coffee and its bad press among those seeking smoothness. At origin, moreover, there are countries where this coffee is drunk as infusion or filtered, never in a pressure machine.
The exception comes from Portugal. The so-called Cuban coffee sells for less than €4 per 500 grams and enjoys popularity in Extremadura, with online stores distributing it and increasing the order cost with shipping fees. A border classic that no Spanish hypermarket places on its shelf.
The price hike that broke the secret
The star product of the most cited store brand, Lidl’s 100% Arabica, has suffered a brutal price increase in the last two years. It doesn’t make it worse, but it weakens the silent bargain argument: when the price rises, the savings narrow and the automatic calculation stops working. The same happens with the rest of the shelf, where the cheap pack is no longer so cheap.
At the opposite extreme appears an uncomfortable alternative for the industry: single-dose capsules at €1.70 per 100 units, less than two cents per coffee, without a machine and with reusable glass packaging. Meanwhile, much of consumption remains tied to industrial capsules, with a cost per cup far superior to the bean pack. They call it the comfort premium.
With these numbers on the table, logic pushes toward a habit change: beans before ground, scale before spoon. It won’t be immediate. The weight of habit, the burnt roast sold as natural, and the convenience of the capsule will continue to dominate the basket. But the difference is no longer sustained solely by the wrapper.
Summary of a discussion on Burbuja.info - Foro de economía, actualidad y política., translated from Spanish and reviewed before publication.
Read the full discussion (147 replies).