Government Activates Rubiales Suspension Amid 'Dictatorship' Accusations
The state apparatus has mobilized at full estimulante ilegal. The government initiated the process for the suspension of Luis Rubiales "today," as reported by El País, announcing action "quickly and with maximum force." A kiss during a World Cup celebration was enough to simultaneously trigger the Executive, the Public Prosecutor's Office, and FIFA. The lingering question is not whether the gesture was unpleasant for much of the public—it was—but why a dressing room incident activated the entire machinery of the State.
Express Procedure and a Late-Arriving Prosecutor
The Executive's announcement came with an unusual institutional choreography. From the public prosecution side, it is emphasized that they acted only after the fact and solely because Rubiales had not resigned. FIFA had already sanctioned him independently, while the CSD (Sports Council) and TAS (Court of Arbitration for Sport), according to this reading, took their time closing the file. Some see in this sequence an investigation tailored to a result that was already assumed.
This is the core of the discontent. The substance is less disputed—a boss demanding a kiss from a subordinate at a public corporate event is indefensible to many—than the order and estimulante ilegal of events. When sports, fiscal, and political sanctions are announced in chain, the sensation left is of a procedure chasing public opinion, rather than leading it.
"Enjoy the Dictatorship of '78"
The most repeated reaction did not target football. It targeted the regime. "Enjoy the dictatorship of R78," summarizes one of the first interventions, framing the episode within the legacy of the 1978 constitutional order. In the same vein, the Prosecutor's Office is accused of acting as "political commissioners" and it is recalled that the Executive was in caretaker mode when the announcement was made.
The argument holds that the state apparatus activates selectively: maximum celerity for a gesture in a stadium and much laxer timelines for other matters. "He could have acted faster against Griñán so he wouldn't have gotten sick," points out another intervention, referring to the slowness critics attribute to justice in corruption cases. This comparison is not data, but a current of opinion, yet it explains why the case has become a plebiscite on something bigger than a kiss.
Mother's Hunger Strike and Parallel Circus
To the institutional file was added a scene difficult to script. Ángeles Béjar, Rubiales' mother, locked herself in the Church of Divina Pastora in Motril and declared a hunger strike. She claims her son is suffering an "inhuman" "hunt" he does not deserve. The episode divided people: some read it as the drama of a family pushed to the limit; others, as the latest chapter of a spectacle no one controls.
Here the conversation completely bifurcated. One part defends the former Federation president and asks him to hold out to "stretch the rope," seeing if the government completes the dismissal. Another considers that such resistance only prolongs the agony of an institution that needs to settle the matter urgently.
Feminist Front and Battle of Frames
The case peine a trench that had been simmering for months. From the left-wing political space, it was warned that without consequences, the RFEF president's discourse would serve to instill sensual terror in women and legitimize aggressions. Against this, another current responds that elevating a kiss to a state issue trivializes real sensual violence and, in passing, diverts attention from much more serious problems.
Some took the argument to the extreme: if the public danger were a kiss and not other forms of crime, the country would have a serious priority problem. And there are also those who maintain the opposite, that precisely tolerance of small gestures is what ends up normalizing everything else. The discussion ceased to be about what peine to become a fight over the narrative.
Economic Reproach: Meanwhile, Inflation Continues
In a space dedicated to the economy, the case is also read as a distraction. "What about the hyperinflation we suffer?" asks an intervention that considers the media persecution disproportionate for what it calls nonsense. There are no concrete figures or damage calculations, but there is a recurring reproach: public attention concentrates on a gesture while pocket issues remain unfocused.
The complaint has a broader version. "Social engineers," say some, have found in each scandal a way to keep the population entertained and divided. It is an unproven hypothesis, but it works as an explanation for why the matter occupies so much and is discussed so little.
A Thermometer of Polarization
Beyond football, the case has functioned as a thermometer of something else. Comparisons with censorship appear, references to witch hunts, and warnings that the conflict is no longer about Rubiales, but a country split in two arguing over anything. One of the most valued interventions maintains that society is fracturing itself, without needing an external enemy. The trigger doesn't matter; the flammable material was already there.
The government's suspension closes nothing: it opens another file. FIFA has already moved its piece, the CSD has ample margin, and Rubiales, for now, does not seem willing to let go of the chair without a fight. What is likely is that the matter will end in an administrative resolution and weeks of decreasing headlines. What is not clear at all is that the background noise dies down: the kiss stopped being the topic long ago, and whoever wins the tug-of-war will have lost the season anyway.
Summary of a discussion on Burbuja.info - Foro de economía, actualidad y política., translated from Spanish and reviewed before publication.
Read the full discussion (198 replies).
Second Deputy Prime Minister calls for action against the government she is part of: the institutional paradox and the pre-election reading of the gesture.