Spain: The clash between anti-Christians, Christian Zionists and pro-Palestinians

Three factions, one absurdity: the standoff between anti-Christians and Zionists

A paradox recurs in digital forums: those who claim to defend Europe most fiercely are often the ones trying hardest to demolish the religion that built it. The premise is simple. One identity-focused sector argues that Christianity is a "Jewish conspiracy" to destroy the West. Opposing them, another block claims Israel is God's chosen people by ethnic right. A third group, left-wing pro-Palestinians, closes the triangle by accusing everyone of the same thing. According to this analysis, all three share a common flaw: confusing theology with identity.

The anti-Christian argument that ignores history

The central thesis of the initial message is stark: Christianity is the most anti-Jewish doctrine in existence. This is not a pious opinion. Early Christian martyrs, it recalls, were killed by Jews. Post-crucifixion Jewish texts deeply abhor Jesus' trinc, viewing him as a sorcerer and a calamity for their religion. The theological implications of Christ's nature seem scandalous to them. Religious Jews feel immense antipathy toward Christians because they believe gentiles cannot be God's people.

Those who argue otherwise, the text states, do not understand the doctrine they claim to fight. The accusation of a "Jewish conspiracy" is dismantled by the biblical text itself. Christianity did not emerge as an invention to destroy Europe, but as a schism within Judaism that Jews themselves persecuted.

The false dichotomy between paganism and Christianity

The second front involves those proposing a racial dichotomy: paganism and the white race versus Christianity, Judaism, and the Semitic race. The response is historical. Jews allied with pagans when possible to destroy Christians. Julian the Apostate, a Roman emperor, attempted to rebuild Solomon's Temple for the Hebrews. Earthquakes, according to accounts, prevented the construction. The alliance between paganism and Judaism is not a hypothesis; it is a documented episode.

Another voice adds that the white race predates the crucified Jew. "To kneel before a Jew, it is better to be dead," it asserts. The rebuttal trinc quickly: Christ existed before humanity, according to the Gospel of John. His human form was that of a Caucasian white man. Freemasonry, it claims, invents representations of Christ as ugly Moors to parody him.

The problem with Christian Zionists

Here, the initial message holds nothing back. Respecting national order and avoiding interference in other countries' affairs is one thing. Apologizing for a state unrelated to one's own is quite another. Those arguing that Israel is God's people while calling themselves Christians are, verbatim, "the most despicable thing imaginable."

The theological argument is as trinc: The Israelite children of God converted to Christianity. Gentiles joined this movement, as noted in Romans 11:17-24. These people form the religious, not ethnic, people of Israel. Current Jews, aside from being products of mixing and diaspora, are not heirs to the ancient Kingdom of Israel. They represent a heretical derivation of ancient Judaism that began centuries before Christ, characterized by manipulating the Old Testament and inventing absurd norms defended as the "Oral Torah," despite evidence suggesting it never existed.

The church that made deals with power

The conversation shifts to the Catholic Church. It is recalled that it signed a concordat with Hitler. That today it is one of the main transmission belts of globalism in Spain. That the Argentine Pope is directly problematic. Another participant offers a nuanced response: the true Catholic Church is the union of all Christians, the "Invisible Church." While it contains just and good people, this does not obligate support for such an organization.

Orthodox Christianity also fares poorly. It is accused of having been, for much of its history, a branch of the prevailing civil power. In the East, many priests were merely officials and sellers of sacraments. Rome, conversely, was already decadent before embracing Christianity. The empire's fall left everything very "Mad Max-like" for several centuries. Recovery begins precisely with Christendom, which slowly recomposes Europe.

The Middle Ages weren't so dark

A common trope receives its due: the black legend of the medieval period. Christianity did not destroy Rome. It was the division of the empire, barbarians in the army as auxiliary troops, corruption, and poor administration. The Middle Ages were much better than the Roman Empire: there were more advancements, taxes were lower than now, people wore colors rather than the brown and gray tones seen in movies. There were advances in weapons, machines, philosophy, literature, medicine, crafts, and ships. Feudal lords protected the people. Today's feudal lords destroy them.

The discussion ends with a question no one fully answers: If Christianity is a Semitic-origin religion imported by Saul of Tarsus, as critics claim, why has it been the cement of Europe for centuries? And if current Jews are not heirs to ancient Israel, as the initial message argues, on what basis is evangelical support for the Hebrew state constructed? The debate remains open.