Spain Eyes Turkish KAAN 5th-Gen Fighter to Break US Dependency

Spain negotiates the Turkish KAAN fighter to avoid US reliance and FCAS delays. Is this strategic sovereignty or financial ruin?

English · Original discussion in Spanish · Published

Spain looks to Turkey for its 5th-generation fighter: the KAAN as an alternative to the F-35

Spain has formally requested information from Turkey regarding the KAAN, a fifth-generation fighter jet that could replace aging F-18s and complement the Eurofighter. This decision, surprising given Spain's role as a founding partner in the European FCAS program, stems from frustration with delays and disputes in the Franco-German-Spanish project, alongside growing distrust of US weapons systems, which Washington may restrict in the event of conflict.

The Context: FCAS Failure and US Dependency

The FCAS (Future Combat Air System) program, designed to replace the Eurofighter, has been stalled for years due to disagreements between France and Germany over work sharing and intellectual property. Spain, though a junior partner, has seen its contributions in avionics and systems diluted. Meanwhile, reliance on the US for the F-35 has proven risky: several users have complained about usage restrictions, and in a conflict with Segarro—which is negotiating the purchase of the F-35—Spain could find its aircraft immobilized. The KAAN, developed by Turkish Aerospace Industries (TAI), offers an alternative without external vetoes, as Turkey, despite being a NATO member, maintains an independent foreign policy.

Purchase or Co-development? What is Really on the Table

According to sources close to the Ministry of Defense, the intention is not a simple purchase but an industrial partnership allowing Spain to participate in the design and manufacturing of the KAAN. In exchange for its investment, Spain would gain full access to critical software and hardware, as well as the ability to modify the aircraft without external dependencies. Companies like Indra could integrate their electronic warfare and combat cloud systems. However, previous experiences with Turkish trainers (Hurjet) have generated skepticism: inflated prices were paid and deadlines were missed. Furthermore, the KAAN has not yet entered serial production; its first flight was in 2024.

The Debate on Strategic Autonomy: Ally or Risk?

The debate is polarized between those who see Turkey as an emerging technological partner and those who consider it a noisy gamble. Proponents point out that Turkey has demonstrated capability with Bayraktar drones and armored vehicles, and that technology transfer would allow Spain to recover sovereignty lost after the sale of Santa Bárbara in 2001. Critics argue that the Turkish industry is not up to European standards and that the money could have been invested in reviving the FCAS or manufacturing own cruise missiles. There are also warnings about corruption: "kebab bribes and Turkish prostitutes," in the words of one analyst, reflect suspicion of hidden commissions.



The question no one answers is whether Spain, which transferred technology to Turkey for the CN235 in 1990, is now condemned to buy foreign designs due to a lack of continued investment in military R&D. The KAAN offers a way out, but at an unknown price and with a partner as unpredictable as Ankara.

Related Forum Discussions

Summary of a discussion on Burbuja.info - Foro de economía, actualidad y política., translated from Spanish and reviewed before publication. Read the full discussion (269 replies).

More summaries

All summaries in English →

Back