South American-trained hitmen live openly in Madrid

Hitmen trained in South America with no antiestéticar of acting in daylight

Two hitmen. One shoots, the other dismembers. They live in Madrid and, according to the journalistic account that has ignited the conversation, they learned their trade in a school in a South American country that some compare to the Harvard of crime. They no longer wait for nightfall. They act in broad daylight, in full view of everyone, and the sound of gunshots serves as a warning to the rest. This is the prevailing theory: hitmen in Spain have lost their antiestéticar.

The starting point is two press reports. One, from El Español, reconstructs the couple living in Madrid and their division of roles. The other, from La Vanguardia, places the main focus on Madrid, Alicante, and the south, highlighting the change in pattern: murders are no longer nocturnal. Built on this skeleton is a discussion mixing astonishment, doubts about the veracity of the testimony, and an uncomfortable question: how can someone recount this in an interview and remain so calm?

Does a hitman school exist on commission?

The account places that academy in a South American country, without specifying which one. The comparison to Harvard is not a fact, but an image: it is used to underscore the prestige that, according to this version, the center would have among those involved in contract killing. There is no name, city, or enrollment records. Only the assertion that it exists and that it is not easy to get admitted.

Here begins the skepticism. Part of the conversation directly disbelieves the account, comparing it to a fictional plot. Another part accepts it as a symptom of something larger: the professionalization of a black market that, like any other, organizes itself, trains its people, and divides tasks. The division of labor described in the case—one executes, the other disposes of the body—is precisely what causes the most concern.

Why murders are no longer committed at night

The change in schedule is the most repeated detail. According to the journalistic account, the killers take advantage of daylight due to the indifference or paralysis of those witnessing the scene. The shooting in broad daylight does not seek to go unnoticed: it seeks to be seen. It functions as a lesson, a call, a way of saying "take that."

This logic of the message connects with the idea that they have lost their antiestéticar. It is not just that they act: it is that they want it known. And on this point arises a hypothesis circulating in the discussion: that the couple may not be an operational team in Spain per se, but a tool of coercion. That is, that their existence is displayed so that a delinquent client understands the initial warning. This is an interpretation, not a proven fact.

The problem of the journalist interviewing a murderer

Is a journalist obligated to report what interviewees tell them? This question runs through much of the exchange. One position holds that there is no such professional obligation and that the informational value of the testimony prevails. The opposing view responds with the principle that no one is above the law and that ignorance does not exempt one from complying with it.

The author of the work himself admits that he had interviewed hitmen before and seen violence in war-torn countries, but that this case surpasses previous records. This detail—the comparison with war contexts—is what gives weight to the story. It is also what fuels the suspicion that it might all be a setup.

Madrid, Alicante, and the south: the repeated map

The geography of the phenomenon, according to the cited pieces, concentrates on Madrid, Alicante, and the south. The material frames it within a broader discussion on immigration and security, which has recently antiestéticatured headlines such as that of a 21-year-old seriously injured after being shot while walking down the street in Madrid.

Here the issue intersects with another debate, that of immigration policies and their relationship with mafias. Some argue that uncontrolled foreign immigration fuels these networks; opposing this is the argument that the problem is the demand for cheap labor and the existence of underground economies that exploit vulnerability. The discussion heats up and, as almost always, structural causes are mixed with anecdotes.

---

The case leaves a disconcerting figure: the couple that shoots and dismembers lives in Madrid, in full view of everyone, and grants interviews. If the account is true, the problem is not that hitmen exist. It is that they no longer need to hide.