Show broadcasts civil servant found clocking in for colleagues

[
Clocking in for others: punishment in the private versus public sector

A civil servant has been recorded clocking in, and allegedly for many other colleagues as well. The images were broadcast by the program En el punto de mira, on Cuatro and Mediaset. As of this discussion, no disciplinary file has been resolved nor any judicial ruling exists.
On the table are a video and an uncomfortable question: what punishment truly applies to bypassing the clock at everyone's expense.

According to various thread comments, the quick answer is that almost none. The long answer depends on where you look.

What is known about the case?

According to the program, a public employee uses multiple cards in one shift for various colleagues. That is all that has been made public. The rest—how many cards, how long, or with management's knowledge—is not substantiated and should not be filled in with intuition.

What several participants describe is an old mechanism: time control in administration relies on the good faith and vigilance of the colleague next to you. When the first fails and the second hinders, the system detects nothing.

Why is it said that in the private sector it's dismissal and almost never in the public

The contrast is the core of all the anger. In a private company, clocking in for a colleague constitutes very serious misconduct and leads to dismissal, argues one participant. In the civil service, the impression gathered by several comments is that the punishment often remains a suspension from duty and salary of short duration: one ironizes that it will be "a week."

There is a second, more uncomfortable argument launched by one comment: if nobody notices the absence of the clocked-in person, perhaps the post didn't need anyone inside.

Casa del Mar, fingerprint and coffee break time

Specific accounts come from the service windows. At Casa del Mar in A Coruña, according to the testimony of someone waiting for an appointment, an employee passes four or five cards at 8:30 and leaves for breakfast. Next to the time clock is a sign prohibiting recording or photography.
At the maritime captaincy of the same city, at 10:30, the attendant reports they are on their coffee break. These are anecdotes without independent verification, but several participants present them as a known routine.

The technical alternative suggested by some comments is fingerprint clocking, which they say already exists in various administrations. It doesn't solve the underlying issue; it solves traceability. And yet, according to these accounts, where it exists, shenanigans still occur.

Identity theft: what can be prosecuted

Within the legal framework circulated in the thread, identity theft and possible malfeasance are mentioned, always as hypotheses without known formal charges.

The one who records, the one who pays

A suspicion runs through the entire matter: that the reaction will not be prosecuting those who clocked in for others, but rather those who recorded it. Some recall that time clocks are usually accompanied by signs prohibiting recording or photography. If this happens, it will be clear who the system protects.

With these pieces, and according to the thread comments, the reasonable expectation is an administrative sanction and little subsequent noise. It is possible, though no one bets on it, that pressure will force a model punishment. What won't change tomorrow is the fundamental issue: as long as public time control depends on a colleague looking the other way, fraud will only surface when someone turns on a camera.