Shared custody: Two weeks a month to rebuild life

Esther Jaurrieta defends shared custody because it grants her two weeks free every month. The case reopens the debate on child support and children.

English · Original discussion in Spanish · Published

Shared custody: Two weeks a month to rebuild life
Shared custody: two weeks a month to rebuild life

Can a divorce be called a success? For Esther Jaurrieta, an administrator at a hospital in Vitoria with two daughters aged 8 and 10, the answer is yes: "Happily Divorced" is the title of the book she wrote during the pandemic and also the label she uses to describe herself in an interview published on May 28, 2024. Her central argument is not sentimental, but about time management. Shared custody gives her two full weeks free every month. "I am the owner of my life again," she summarizes.

The figure orders the entire story. Fifteen days each month to go out with friends, go hiking, go to the theater, or simply not answer to anyone. Before, when she was married, any plan involved domestic negotiation, in which, she claims, women lost out. Now there is nothing to negotiate: the agenda is hers.

How do you get to shared custody and what does it entail?

Jaurrieta made the decision six years ago and it was not painless. "At first it was a pavor, because I wanted full custody," she admits. Her ex-partner did not grant it to her, which forced her to accept a split that she now defends vehemently. This turn—from claiming exclusivity to claiming a split—is the axis of her discourse.

The split has had an unexpected effect on her non-family life. With those two free weeks, she has gone back to study, taken a monologue course, trained in coaching, and resumed projects outside her employment. Two years ago, she walked the Camino de Santiago alone and describes it as one of the best weeks of her life. From there came a group of seven people: two from Alicante, two from Madrid, two from Murcia, and her.

The economic calculation: child support and high incomes

In the economic sphere, one participant argues that shared custody is only advantageous for men above a certain income level—the threshold he mentions is 80,000 euros annually—without providing any data to support this. It is an opinion from the thread, not a verified figure.

This is the part of the matter that hardly appears in stories about divorces presented as happy. Shared custody is told as an emotional conquest, and in the exchange of messages, it is discussed as a cost item: housing, school, working hours, and shifts that rarely fit together.

Is it better for children? What nobody measures

The most repeated argument among those who defend the model is that it prevents minors from living with permanent conflict. Better two peaceful homes than one with shouting, it seems to say. The evidence provided is common sense and personal experience.

Against this weighs another objection, the most repeated: changing houses, customs, and schedules every fifteen days. Minors who pack their suitcase on Sunday, who adapt to two different rules and sometimes to two new adults. Cases of school failure and bad company are listed, as well as the effect of having a permissive fortnight and a disciplinary one, where the parent who imposes rules ends up playing the ungrateful role. It is testimony, not statistics: no one has yet published the series that measures this impact house by house.

Do you rebuild your life after a divorce?

Jaurrieta says she does not feel the need. "I am fine without a partner," she says, although she has Tinder and acknowledges several casual flings without a stable relationship. Nor is the social circle intact: of her group of friends, three are divorced and the rest are single or with a partner. Coordinating custody shifts to socialize is a puzzle, and some friendships are lost because they were shared with the ex-partner.

The story of the happy divorce and the underlying suspicion

A part of the replies does not dispute the facts, but the framework. Several messages claim, without any proof, that a media outlet devoting headlines to a divorce presented as a success, with a book and a monologue course, is part of a supposed social engineering aimed at normalizing the breakup. Other voices, on the other hand, defend exactly the opposite from the other side: separated people who recognize themselves in the text and who claim the right not to endure an unbearable coexistence.

Between these two extremes lies an uncomfortable coincidence: almost all the messages talk about adults. Her, about the two free weeks. The other side, about child support and the apartment. Schedules, homework, and exams appear as an argument, not as the subject.

With these threads, divorce with children continues to be told as a personal decision with accounting effects. No one has yet published the girls' two weeks.

Also available in: Deutsch

Summary of a discussion on Burbuja.info - Foro de economía, actualidad y política., translated from Spanish and reviewed before publication. Read the full discussion (299 replies).

More summaries

All summaries in English →

-
Back