From €30 Glenlivet to €65 Lagavulin: Peated without breaking the bank
Some people decide to treat themselves to a good bottle of whisky. A occasional dram, for those moments when you feel like it or simply need it. Asking an expert always yields the same type of answer: a list of Scottish malts with prices, alcohol content, and warnings. And a question that doesn't resolve itself: how much do you have to spend for your palate to notice the difference?
The short answer from the advice is that the useful price range starts around €30 and that, from there on, each price jump buys more strength, more smoke, or more years, not necessarily more pleasure. The long answer depends on whether the drinker likes peat. And almost everything revolves around that.
The real price range: from €19 to €180
The references used are specific. Glenlivet 12 years costs around €30 and is presented as the best value for money to start with, antiestéticaturing a friendly profile. Ardbeg 12 stays at about €50, and Lagavulin 16, the most cited of all, sits around €65 in stores. Those looking for something cheaper for daily use have Cardhu for about €19, especially if they take advantage of discount coupons from a well-known supermarket's loyalty card.
At the top end, prices skyrocket. Johnnie Walker Blue Label ranges between €165 and €180 at its usual online selling price. In the UK, the same type of bottle costs 50% more due to tax pressure: the calculation is that what sells there at shelf price would be equivalent to about €40 here. There is savings potential in cross-border shopping: Lagavulin 16 has been acquired on the Italian website of a major distributor for about €52, a notable reduction compared to the Spanish street price. The bottle-by-bottle breakdown leaves a table worth checking before opening your wallet.
Peat yes, peat no: the axis that orders everything
Peat is the great divider. Peated or not. The smoky whiskies from Islay, led by Laphroaig and Lagavulin, have a legion of supporters who describe them with a taste of smoke and smell of oil, "for quiet evenings in slippers by the fireplace." They are loved as much as they divide opinions: some consider them the gateway to single malt, while others can't stand them.
On the opposite side are the honeyed profiles of the Highlands, such as Dalwhinnie, and the softer ones from Macallan, which enter easily. For those who want peat without the punch of the islanders, there is Irish Connemara, with a more contained smokiness and much cheaper than Lagavulin. In the realm of powerhouses, Talisker works as a consensus vote. The anecdote accompanying these bottles is almost advertising-worthy: during US Prohibition, it is said that Lagavulin was allowed into the country labeled as medicinal product.
Do you add water or ice to whisky?
Here the schism is almost theological. Orthodoxy dictates adding water, always, a small splash of still water so the whisky opens up: excess alcohol, it is argued, prevents appreciating the flavor, and eventually everything tastes the same. Ice is reserved for the Spanish summer: cold numbs the aromas, and ice dilutes the drink if the glass lasts too long. The most repeated intermediate solution is keeping the bottle cool and adding a few drops of mineral water.
There is one exception that demands it: cask strength bottlings, bottled at barrel strength without dilution. Aberlour A'Bunadh hovers around 62 degrees and burns without a splash of fresh water. For those who want bubbles, sparkling water or soda refreshes and helps appreciate the aroma, although it changes the taste: it no longer just tastes like whisky.
The tasting begins and the palate decides otherwise
The person asking about a bottle ended up buying several. The journey is revealing. The first batch included a bourbon that he loved: smooth, pleasant in mouth, with a convincing scent. With it came a cocktail that became the household favorite. Then came Glenlivet 12: the first impression was lukewarm, "neither fish nor fowl," with the feeling that it didn't satisfy after a long sip. The second tasting, calmer and diluted with water, changed the verdict.
The final confession disconcerts anyone who trinc the catalog of Scottish malts: for now, between bourbon and whisky, he leans towards bourbon. And with the Glenlivet bottle still sitting on the table.
Pretentiousness, oligopoly, and battle whisky
Not everything is Lagavulin. Over the conversation looms the suspicion that part of the interest in the rarest single malts responds to pretentiousness, to see who has the most exclusive bottle. Against this, cheap and honest whisky is championed: the one bought with a supermarket offer and drunk with ice without the world falling apart.
Also emerging is criticism of the industry's large multinational, owner of half a dozen of the best-selling brands, and the rejection of the most popular labels precisely because they are popular. Nevertheless, it is conceded that an ordinary whisky tastes good as long as one enjoys drinking it, and bad if the whisky isn't liked, regardless of the price. Some even buy a battle bottle for little more than five euros with a 50% promotion and defend that the result is worth what it costs.
And the data point that leaves everything in the air? That after recommending someone a list of high-end malts, insisting that Laphroaig is the threshold and peat the great marker of character, the recipient of the advice ends up preferring a bourbon and glancing sideways at the €30 Glenlivet. The palate, they say, doesn't understand rankings.
Summary of a discussion on Burbuja.info - Foro de economía, actualidad y política., translated from Spanish and reviewed before publication.
Read the full discussion (175 replies).