Satanism and Elite Power: Faith or Control?

The Elite and Satanic Cults: Faith or Tool of Control?

Does the elite believe in a satanic god or use it as a tool for cohesion and control? The debate, fueled by ceremonies like those at the Paris Olympics, pits those who see genuine faith against those who reduce it to pure power theater. The evidence cited is symbolic and documentary, not judicial.

Origin of the Debate: From Accusations of «Satanism» to Symbolic Evidence

The starting point is an explicit accusation: that the elite practices a satanic religion involving sacrifices and ritual cannibalism, citing ancient records like the "Blood Libel" as proof. This is compounded by the circulation of a Macron video claimed to be nearly a decade old and unrefuted by fact-checkers. The discussion quickly shifts to symbolism: Olympic ceremonies, closing posters, and public gestures that, for some, reveal a hidden cult.

Why Is the Elite Accused of Practicing Satanism?

The central thesis is that the elite believes in nothing but uses Satanism as a method of differentiation and control. It is argued that controlling the narrative—the "story"—allows them to control minds and, consequently, actions. From this perspective, rituals are not sincere faith but a form of internal cohesion and a display of power before the masses. The opposing hypothesis holds that many members do profess a real demonic faith, and that this faith guarantees the execution of pavor: anyone abandoning the common project knows the punishment would be Dante-esque for them and their families.

The Role of Symbolism: From the "Blood Libel" to the Olympics

The discussion relies on a symbolic repertoire: Pope Francis's Good Shepherd cross, submissive gestures in handshakes, tattoos, and ornaments revealing ranks within a hidden hierarchy. Paintings by an artist depicting child rape and murder are mentioned, with claims that Podesta owned such works. The Paris Olympics opening ceremony is interpreted as an openly satanic ritual, and the closing poster is read as a compendium of hidden symbolism. For skeptics, all this is ambiguous iconography interpreted through pre-existing frameworks.

Are Elites Human or Something Else?

One current insists they are simply humans with power accumulated over centuries, arguing that attributing divine capabilities grants them undeserved power. Another claims they are not human, or at least possessed by entities from another dimension. The discussion turns to the nature of Satan: whether he absorbs knowledge, if he was a rebellious subordinate or an equal, and if his animal representation reflects sarracena baseness. Theological stances intersect with politics: the Roman Empire never fell, it transformed, and Switzerland would be the true financial and power center, with the Swiss Guard protecting the pope.

Narrative Control as a Tool of Power

It is argued that spreading material contrary to a creed generates stress and self-affirmation in faith, enslaving the individual and depriving them of critical judgment. This mechanism applies to religious beliefs, politics—"reds" and "ours"—and gender issues. The conclusion is that whoever controls the production of imagery and "stories" controls minds, and whoever controls minds controls actions. The masses, it is said, think with their "bottom," which is why obvious messages work as camouflage.

The Counterargument: Disbelief and Skepticism

Against the cult thesis rises disbelief: if it were so easy, any parent would sell their soul to save a sick child. The response is that the dark side does not accept good intentions or positive ends, and contacting these entities requires being in the right circles and performing the right rituals. Another objection notes that the elite is aseptic and rituals are merely methods of differentiation; their greatest pleasure would be mocking the masses. The discussion closes without consensus: some see real faith, others power theater, but all agree that symbols, in the hands of those in charge, are never innocent.