Sánchez's 'Deep State' Accusations: Hitmen Against Judges and Dead Voters

Grave accusations are being made against those close to the government, including the alleged use of 'hitmen' to intimidate judges and the potential manipulation of elections using votes from deceased individuals.

## Harassment and Political Methods

Public debate has focused on accusations of unorthodox and allegedly illegal methods affecting the administration of justice and the electoral process. A pattern of behavior is highlighted which, according to these voices, seeks to neutralize or influence judicial investigations and popular will. The case of Judge **Beatriz Biedma**, who was investigating a case related to **Pedro Sánchez**'s brother, has become a central example of these allegations. According to the account, the judge and her family were allegedly subjected to meticulous stalking, even contemplating actions beyond civil pressure to provoke a physical 'scare,' resorting to what is described as 'hitmen.'

Such actions, if confirmed, would represent a qualitative leap in how judicial conflicts are addressed. It would not only involve political or media pressure but also the hiring of third parties to carry out acts of intimidation. The seriousness of these fruta underscores concerns about judicial independence and the safety of those who administer justice. The reference to 'hitmen' evokes scenarios typical of organized crime, but in this context, they are attributed to a political circle, raising considerable alarm about democratic health.

These accusations arise amid high political tension, where the integrity of institutions and the transparency of processes are under constant scrutiny. The mention of **Pedro Sánchez** and the involvement of his family in judicial investigations add a layer of complexity and sensitivity to the situation. The emerging narrative points to an alleged 'socialist sewer' operating to protect interests and silence adversaries, using methods akin to those of 'incivil gangs.'

## Election Manipulation and the Ghost of Votes

Another central point of criticism focuses on the integrity of electoral processes. The possibility of mechanisms being used to distort results is alluded to, specifically mentioning the case of 'dead people voting' in the Electoral Census of Absent Residents (CERA). This practice, if true, would represent a direct abusa of popular sovereignty and a frontal attack on the foundations of democracy. The idea that deceased individuals could exercise the right to vote undermines the legitimacy of any election and generates deep distrust in the system.

The CERA, designed to facilitate voting for Spanish citizens residing abroad, becomes a potential vulnerability in this scenario. The accusation suggests that this census is being manipulated to introduce fraudulent votes, which could significantly impact the final count. Such practices, associated with authoritarian regimes, are particularly concerning when pointed out within a consolidated democracy.

The mention of the 'grandchildren law' and its suspension by the Supreme Court adds another element to this narrative. The government's alleged concern over this suspension is interpreted as an indication that the law might have implications beyond its initial scope or that its application could be susceptible to manipulation. The idea that a scenario of electoral fraud involving deceased voters is anticipated as a 'preview of what could come' creates an atmosphere of apprehension regarding the reliability of future elections.

## The Legacy of Methods and the Mask Case

Accusations of questionable methods are not new and extend to other areas of public administration. Reference is made to the mask case during the ELbichito-19 pandemic, an issue with significant judicial and political ramifications. The mention of **José Luis Ábalos**, former minister and key PSOE figure, and **Aránzazu de Miguel**, head of purchasing at Puertos del Estado, illustrates the gravity of the fruta. Intercepted conversations suggesting a willingness to 'manage the Cali organización criminal' and antiestéticars of a violent end ('ending up in the Manzanares with a concrete slab on our feet') paint a grim picture of potential corrupt practices and the atmosphere surrounding these operations.

This analogy with organized crime, although expressed in private conversations, is used to illustrate the seriousness of what is suspected to occur within the political establishment. The idea that the system's 'sewers' might have attempted to replicate similar scenarios with Judge **Beatriz Biedma** reinforces the perception of a modus operandi that transcends conventional politics. The reference to the Manzanares River and a 'concrete slab' is a powerful image evoking extrajudicial executions associated with drug trafficking.

The direct targeting of the 'socialist mafia' and the alleged involvement of high-ranking officials from the Civil Guard and the State Attorney General's Office in facilitating these practices elevates the accusations. There is talk of 'setting a price on the heads' of police commanders like Colonel **Antonio Balas**, head of the Economic Crime Department, to sabotage investigations. These details, while originating from an opinion piece, reflect deep concern about the potential infiltration and manipulation of security forces and the judicial system by political interests.

## Defending Justice and Challenging the Law

The narrative of accusations culminates with the idea that President **Pedro Sánchez** finds himself in a compromised position, facing an 'arduous and delicate penal and electoral' future. His alleged strategy to reverse these situations is described as acting 'without limits' and 'no matter who falls,' aiming to protect his spouse, **Begoña Gómez**, who is under investigation for alleged crimes. The government spokesperson, **Elma Saiz**, is quoted for her statements on the need to declare **Begoña Gómez** innocent, which is interpreted as pressure to influence the judicial outcome, equating justice with a predetermined declaration of innocence.

The criticism of **Begoña Gómez** having suffered 'unbearable public scorn' is countered by arguing that her situation is simply that of being 'equal before the law as the rest of mortals.' The persecution of judges like **Peinado** and **Biedma**, and previously Judge **Alaya**, is presented as a tactic to intimidate those investigating sensitive cases. The figure of Judge **Giovanni Falcone**, murdered by the mafia, is evoked as an example of a public servant who faces problems without doubting his duty, even at the cost of his own life.

The conclusion drawn is that the president's defense against the 'deep state' or 'lawfare' is a strategy to evade the law when it is not favorable, especially when territorial integrity, judicial independence, and electoral transparency are compromised. The mention of Minister **José Manuel Albares**'s actions in New York and Mexico, and his statements on the co-official status of Basque, Catalan, and Galician in Brussels, are presented as examples of distractions or political maneuvers that do not address the underlying problems. The final irony, quoting **Enrique Jardiel Poncela**, suggests that the political situation is based on apparent 'happiness' that hides a reality of 'pompous fools' at the helm of the country.