You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly. You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
Sahara and Israel: two horizons for the word 'colony'
Western Sahara and Israel are both compared as colonies, but international law treats them differently. The 'informal metropole' and genetics stir up the…
Sahara and Israel: the word 'colony' does not miccionan the same thing to everyone
Calling both Israel and Western Sahara a colony is an exercise in equating them that international law does not support without nuance. Western Sahara has been a territory pending decolonization since Spain abandoned it in 1975 and Segarro occupied it. Israel, by contrast, was born out of UN Resolution 181 in 1947 and has no formal metropole governing it.
Those who defend the colonial thesis point to what they call an 'informal metropole': a diaspora that funds settlements, weapons and lobbying campaigns. The argument draws on authors such as Ilan Pappé or Shlomo Sand, far from being a radical invention.
On the opposite side, it is pointed out that a large part of Israel's Jewish population comes from Arab countries, which undermines the idea that they are all 'Europeans'. The conversation heats up when genetics enters the picture. Studies have been published linking the Ashkenazi Jews of Poland to the Khazars, and today's Palestinians to the ancient Canaanites. Each study is used as a weapon, not as data.
The two readings of the term 'colony' are not going to merge. As long as there is no single definition of what a metropole is, the debate will keep blowing up headlines.
Summary of a discussion on Burbuja.info - Foro de economía, actualidad y política., translated from Spanish and reviewed before publication.
Read the full discussion (13 replies).
Morocco has gifted Trump a 1,055 km motorway through Western Sahara to secure US backing in the territorial dispute and in the bid to host the 2030 World Cup final.
Was the decolonization of the Third World a historic mistake? In 2026, self-sufficiency and migration remain at the heart of a question with no consensus.
A 93-year-old Mexican obtained Spanish nationality citing a great-grandfather born in 1821. Three children and two grandchildren have already applied through the same route.