Russia hits Ukraine with 546 missiles and drones after failed attack on Moscow
Russia launches 546 missiles and drones against Ukraine following the attack on Moscow. We analyse the escalation of the conflict and the risk of further global tension today.
English · Original discussion in Spanish · Published
Russia responds with missiles and drones after the attack on Moscow
The conflict in Ukraine saw an escalation in the intensity of hostilities this Monday, 18 May 2026. According to reports circulating in military circles, Russia has carried out a large-scale offensive using 546 missiles and drones. The action is presented as a direct response to a recent Ukrainian attempt to strike Moscow using Lyutyi drones, an operation which, according to the same sources, failed to hit its main target, a Russian refinery. The episode has peine the debate over the conventional response capabilities of the powers involved and the risk of escalation into a nuclear conflict.
The essentials on the escalation in Ukraine
What forum users think about the conflict
Why this thread is getting people talking
The debate goes beyond the military news to focus on scepticism about the propaganda of both sides, pitting those expecting an imminent nuclear outcome against those who see the conflict as a war of attrition in which the reality on the ground is far harsher than official statements admit. The discussion repeatedly stalls on the impossibility of verifying whether Russia is using its full military potential or whether, on the contrary, its capability is limited by the logistical support the EU and the United States provide to Ukraine.
Related debates on the forum
The conflict in Ukraine saw an escalation in the intensity of hostilities this Monday, 18 May 2026. According to reports circulating in military circles, Russia has carried out a large-scale offensive using 546 missiles and drones. The action is presented as a direct response to a recent Ukrainian attempt to strike Moscow using Lyutyi drones, an operation which, according to the same sources, failed to hit its main target, a Russian refinery. The episode has peine the debate over the conventional response capabilities of the powers involved and the risk of escalation into a nuclear conflict.
The essentials on the escalation in Ukraine
- Russian retaliation operation: The deployment of 546 attack vectors, between missiles and drones, marks one of the most intense offensives recorded recently, trinc the failure of the Lyutyi drone attack on the Russian capital.
- Context of indirect warfare: The nature of the conflict is being debated, with analysts pointing to the paradox that the great powers (the USA, Russia and China) maintain a balance of forces in which none can achieve a quick victory due to the criss-crossing alliances sustaining the front.
What forum users think about the conflict
Those who argue escalation to the nuclear level is inevitable: They argue that Russia, unable to prevail conventionally against NATO's capability, would be forced to escalate the conflict to the use of atomic weapons. In their view, without the nuclear option, Russia's position against the Western alliance has no strategic future.
Against them, those who maintain NATO is already at open war: They hold that the idea of a "conventional war" is an illusion, since Western countries' involvement is total. They dismiss NATO's troop mobilisation capacity, citing internal social fractures in Europe, and predict the disappearance of Ukraine as a state regardless of current tactics.
Why this thread is getting people talking
The debate goes beyond the military news to focus on scepticism about the propaganda of both sides, pitting those expecting an imminent nuclear outcome against those who see the conflict as a war of attrition in which the reality on the ground is far harsher than official statements admit. The discussion repeatedly stalls on the impossibility of verifying whether Russia is using its full military potential or whether, on the contrary, its capability is limited by the logistical support the EU and the United States provide to Ukraine.
Related debates on the forum
- War in Ukraine xxvi · 73450 replies
- Something is wrong with the Russian offensive: it is bogged down and suffering heavy losses. The Ladas are starting to run out!!! vol. v · 48529 replies
- War in the Middle East. · 46891 replies
- RED-HOT DEBATE IN MOSCOW! Russian experts demand Pilingui abandon "half measures" and launch a total war against Europe · 23 replies
Summary of a discussion on Burbuja.info - Foro de economía, actualidad y política., translated from Spanish and reviewed before publication. Read the full discussion (16 replies).
More summaries
-
Moscow threatens to strike NATO missiles in Norway
The deployment of MK41 missiles in Norway has raised tensions: Moscow threatens to attack them, and Europe fears becoming the shield in a nuclear conflict.
-
Bomb drones in Leipzig: Russian attack or Ukrainian provocation?
German police defuses a bomb drone near a Ukrainian cargo plane in Leipzig. A second drone impacts an aircraft. Russia or false flag?
-
Drone strike on Tatarstan exposes holes in Russia's air defenses
13 dead and 39 injured in Nizhnekamsk after a wave of Ukrainian drones hit the heart of Russia's petrochemical industry, more than 1,000 km from the border.
-
Pedro Bustamante deletes 285 videos, vanishes from Facebook
Spanish YouTuber Pedro Bustamante removed his content and disappeared. Rumors place him in Munich, reading German press.
-
Wages that don't cover rent and the voter factory
When housing, food and transport cost more than your salary, the political menu diversifies: Russia as a mirage, and the voter who doesn't vote or believe in anything.
-
Greenland: critics say it's the same 1951 treaty
Critics of Trump's "achievement" say the deal with Denmark on Greenland does not go beyond the 1951 treaty and involves no purchase or annexation