Running through a wildfire's front line: survival or suicide?
Crossing perpendicular through a wildfire into the burned area may be the only way out, but the risks of asphyxiation and burns from the smoldering ground are…
English · Original discussion in Spanish · Published
Crossing a wildfire's front line: a viable strategy?
When a brush fire advances, instinct says to flee in the opposite direction. But in situations with no escape, some preppers advocate a counterintuitive maneuver: crossing the fire front perpendicularly into the already burned area. The logic is that burned ground will not burn again. However, the consensus among experts warns that the real danger is not the flames, but the smoke and the burning ground.
CO2 and the lack of oxygen at the fire front can cause asphyxiation before you reach the other side. It is argued that convection currents renew the air, but the margin is narrow. Once in the burned area, the ground is a bed of embers: walking without proper footwear can cause severe burns. Even days later, underground stumps keep smoldering.
Alternatively, the classic technique of setting a backfire (a controlled burn downwind) allows you to take shelter in the scorched area, avoiding direct exposure. But it requires foresight and resources.
The question that remains: in a real wildfire, without equipment or time, is it better to risk crossing or to stay in a clearing? The data suggest there is no single answer.
When a brush fire advances, instinct says to flee in the opposite direction. But in situations with no escape, some preppers advocate a counterintuitive maneuver: crossing the fire front perpendicularly into the already burned area. The logic is that burned ground will not burn again. However, the consensus among experts warns that the real danger is not the flames, but the smoke and the burning ground.
CO2 and the lack of oxygen at the fire front can cause asphyxiation before you reach the other side. It is argued that convection currents renew the air, but the margin is narrow. Once in the burned area, the ground is a bed of embers: walking without proper footwear can cause severe burns. Even days later, underground stumps keep smoldering.
Alternatively, the classic technique of setting a backfire (a controlled burn downwind) allows you to take shelter in the scorched area, avoiding direct exposure. But it requires foresight and resources.
The question that remains: in a real wildfire, without equipment or time, is it better to risk crossing or to stay in a clearing? The data suggest there is no single answer.
Also available in: Deutsch
Summary of a discussion on Burbuja.info - Foro de economía, actualidad y política., translated from Spanish and reviewed before publication. Read the full discussion (60 replies).
More summaries
-
From military duffel to supermarket bag: how the prepper forum user gears up
From a supermarket bag to a €550 backpack for carrying a rifle: how prepper forum users equip themselves. Price doesn't always make the difference.
-
Local AI for survival: Reality or tech mirage?
Uncensored offline AI models are being tested on laptops and phones for preppers. Are they truly useful or just expensive toys?
-
Utopia 2013: Where to Download the British Series on P2P
The British series Utopia (2013), with two subtitled seasons, is still available on eMule, torrent and direct download
-
Preparedness in Spain: from hatchet to the afterlife
From a hatchet under the pillow to near-death experiences: Spanish preparedness culture blends low-cost self-defence with new age spirituality
-
Spears, slingshots and fire extinguishers: the debate over homemade self-defense weapons
Spears, slingshots with 4-euro ball bearings, fire extinguishers: an analysis of homemade self-defense weapons, their legality and their real effectiveness after the conviction of a…
-
Home batteries in Spain: the savings that add up and the savings that don't
A user calculates that his €6,500 battery system pays for itself in 4 years. Other forum members question the math: off-peak to peak arbitrage has a ceiling of…