Running a home server with Cloudflare Tunnel
Free Cloudflare Tunnel for a home server: no port forwarding, no CG-NAT and no hosting costs. Opinions and tips from the Burbuja.info forum.
English · Original discussion in Spanish · Published
Home server with Cloudflare Tunnel: goodbye to paid hosting?
Did you know you can run a web server at home without paying for hosting, without a static IP and without opening ports, all for free with Cloudflare Tunnel? That's the idea behind a thread on Burbuja.info, a Spanish forum, which now has 15 replies and questions whether it's still worth paying for a VPS when AI and Google are killing web traffic. The idea: set up a mini PC with Cloudflared and forget about monthly bills.
How does it work and what do you need?
The mechanism is simple: you install a script (cloudflared) on your home server. Cloudflare handles the connection without you having to touch the router or worry about CG-NAT. All you need is a domain managed on Cloudflare. The user Workforfood puts it plainly: "No need to open ports on the router or have a static IP". Other forum members suggest alternatives like Tailscale, which also avoids exposing services to the internet, though without a domain.
The big question is whether it really compares to traditional hosting. Several users point out that for low traffic — blogs, niche sites — it works perfectly. But if you expect traffic spikes, a €5/month VPS at Hetzner may be more reliable. Running a home server means 24/7 power consumption and the risk of downtime if your connection fails. Still, the underlying argument is that organic traffic has all but disappeared: Google and AI bots are eating up the visits.
The deeper debate: is it worth keeping a server at home?
The discussion turns to cost-effectiveness. For Workforfood, paying more than €5 a month for hosting is a mistake when real traffic is minimal. Others like Tantrapunk counter that local businesses still get visits, and that €5 a month is "pocket change" that saves you from having a machine running around the clock. The topic of La Liga blocks also comes up: Ignatius recalls that Cloudflare has been the victim of mass IP blocks during football matches, although Spain's Congress approved measures to curb those practices. Workforfood confirms he experienced it and that "half the internet went down" because of Cloudflare's DNS, but things seem to have calmed down.
What do those already using it think?
W.Morgan uses it and confirms it's free, only requires a domain, and recommends setting up a periodic restart of the tunnel (cloudflared) to keep it from hanging. Reaccionario adds that the free plans allow up to 50 tunnels, and that you can even resell the service to clients for €30/month, sparing them the cost of a static IP from their ISP (€10-15/month) and the hassle of the setup.
The consensus seems to lean towards yes, it's viable for small or personal websites, but not for projects with significant traffic or high availability requirements. The question that remains: how much real traffic can you expect when Google and AI are already sucking up almost all of it?
Related debates on the forum
Did you know you can run a web server at home without paying for hosting, without a static IP and without opening ports, all for free with Cloudflare Tunnel? That's the idea behind a thread on Burbuja.info, a Spanish forum, which now has 15 replies and questions whether it's still worth paying for a VPS when AI and Google are killing web traffic. The idea: set up a mini PC with Cloudflared and forget about monthly bills.
How does it work and what do you need?
The mechanism is simple: you install a script (cloudflared) on your home server. Cloudflare handles the connection without you having to touch the router or worry about CG-NAT. All you need is a domain managed on Cloudflare. The user Workforfood puts it plainly: "No need to open ports on the router or have a static IP". Other forum members suggest alternatives like Tailscale, which also avoids exposing services to the internet, though without a domain.
The big question is whether it really compares to traditional hosting. Several users point out that for low traffic — blogs, niche sites — it works perfectly. But if you expect traffic spikes, a €5/month VPS at Hetzner may be more reliable. Running a home server means 24/7 power consumption and the risk of downtime if your connection fails. Still, the underlying argument is that organic traffic has all but disappeared: Google and AI bots are eating up the visits.
The deeper debate: is it worth keeping a server at home?
The discussion turns to cost-effectiveness. For Workforfood, paying more than €5 a month for hosting is a mistake when real traffic is minimal. Others like Tantrapunk counter that local businesses still get visits, and that €5 a month is "pocket change" that saves you from having a machine running around the clock. The topic of La Liga blocks also comes up: Ignatius recalls that Cloudflare has been the victim of mass IP blocks during football matches, although Spain's Congress approved measures to curb those practices. Workforfood confirms he experienced it and that "half the internet went down" because of Cloudflare's DNS, but things seem to have calmed down.
What do those already using it think?
W.Morgan uses it and confirms it's free, only requires a domain, and recommends setting up a periodic restart of the tunnel (cloudflared) to keep it from hanging. Reaccionario adds that the free plans allow up to 50 tunnels, and that you can even resell the service to clients for €30/month, sparing them the cost of a static IP from their ISP (€10-15/month) and the hassle of the setup.
The consensus seems to lean towards yes, it's viable for small or personal websites, but not for projects with significant traffic or high availability requirements. The question that remains: how much real traffic can you expect when Google and AI are already sucking up almost all of it?
Related debates on the forum
- My doctor tells me I have to take cholesterol pills forever because my own body produces it, wtf?? · 206 replies
- The Leapmotor B05 arrives in Europe with up to 482 km of range from €22,800 · 105 replies
- This electric car is the perfect brother-in-law silencer · 95 replies
- Don't buy Carrefour's ready-made pantomaka, my children · 86 replies
Also available in: Deutsch
Summary of a discussion on Burbuja.info - Foro de economía, actualidad y política., translated from Spanish and reviewed before publication. Read the full discussion (15 replies).
More summaries
-
eMule loses its last servers: classic P2P fades away
eMule Security goes down, honeypot suspicions grow and users are torn between KAD, torrents and local hoarding. Is this the beginning of the end for classic P2P?
-
88,000-book library: read online without downloads or traces
A dedicated server with 88,000 books, instant search and a privacy promise. No downloads, to avoid copyright trouble. Too good to be true?
-
Carrefour ends double refund for pricing errors
Carrefour no longer refunds double the difference for overcharges, limiting compensation to the simple amount as per new store policies.
-
How to make aioli with a hand blender: the method that stops it splitting
Hand blender at the bottom of the glass, low speed and oil in a steady stream: the keys to emulsifying aioli without it splitting
-
Bluetooth: a 1994 standard that still fails at two meters
Bluetooth was born in 1994 and still drops the connection at two meters. Some blame cheap hardware; others, the shared 2.4 GHz band.
-
KH-7 Sin Manchas: two versions and a warning about blood stains
The active oxygen in KH-7 Sin Manchas is hydrogen peroxide; a user warns that the brand advises against using it on blood stains.