You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly. You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
Rafa Nadal's Dominican move: the deal nobody mentions
Rafa Nadal has settled in the Dominican Republic amid reports of a supposed deal with the Spanish government. The tennis star's silence and precedents set by politicians like Felipe González…
Rafa Nadal's Dominican move: the deal nobody mentions
The news has spread like wildfire in skeptical circles: Rafa Nadal has settled in the Dominican Republic. And not only that: there would supposedly be a non-aggression pact with the Spanish government so that no one touches his house or demands explanations about his hasty departure. The tennis player's silence, they say, is proof of the agreement. But the details are so murky that they seem more like something out of a John le Carré novel than reality.
The tax haven of the powerful
What is verifiable is the appeal the Caribbean island holds for the Spanish elite. Former prime minister Felipe González and former minister José Bono obtained Dominican nationality through privileged naturalization, granted by President Luis Abinader. Both quietly, without headlines. Meanwhile, Nadal —a global figure— leaves without his communications agency confirming or denying anything. A clean slate.
Debates in forums suggest the move is not just about taxes. There is talk of political refuge, of preparing the ground for a possible escape if the situation in Spain turns sour. Something like what the exiles of the Spanish Civil War did, but with better weather and less bureaucracy.
Silence as a strategy
The detail nobody quite fits together: not a word from Nadal since news of his move broke. Not a tweet, not a statement. In journalistic circles this is interpreted as meaning the pact includes a confidentiality clause. Or perhaps he simply has nothing to say: he has moved to where it suits him best financially.
But the shadow of drug trafficking and santería that some associate with the local oligarchy —as has been written— should not be mixed up with an athlete's decision. Everyone knows why they choose a destination. The problem is that when the silence is so absolute, theories proliferate.
If the model of selective exile catches on, we will see more public figures pack their bags. Meanwhile, the official narrative stays quiet. Draw your own conclusions, but with the facts on the table there is still much to clarify.
Summary of a discussion on Burbuja.info - Foro de economía, actualidad y política., translated from Spanish and reviewed before publication.
Read the full discussion (20 replies).
A wolf killed a filly just 100 metres from the centre of Sierra de Ibio, in Cantabria, Spain. The mayor is calling for urgent measures as the debate over responsibility intensifies.
Tesla is withdrawing free Autopilot from some models, fueling the debate over subscriptions, subsidies and Elon Musk's controversial pay package. Is it viable?