You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly. You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
Putting Spain's El Gordo winnings into JEPQ: €3,920 a month in dividends
Spain's Christmas lottery top prize nets €328,000 after tax. Investing it all in JEPQ promises €3,920 a month, but five-year growth is just 1.39%. Is it worth it?
Quitting work with El Rellenito: the plan that divides investors
With Spain's El Rellenito Christmas lottery, the net prize after tax comes to 328,000 euros. The temptation to put it all into a single dividend ETF is more common than it seems. The calculation doing the rounds: buying JEPQ at 23.42 euros gets you around 14,000 shares, and with an average monthly dividend of 0.28 euros per share, the income comes to roughly 3,920 euros gross per month. "No property, no nonsense," the thesis concludes. But the fine print doesn't invite much euphoria.
The yield that melts away
The same calculator that multiplies dividends also warns: over five years, that ETF has gained just 1.39% gross. Between fees and inflation, the real gain evaporates. The sceptical argument is blunt: the only thing guaranteed is losing purchasing power every year, whatever you do. Some investors argue it's better to use it as a dividend-generating cushion and reinvest those payments into assets with more potential, such as the S&P 500, the Nasdaq or Bitcoin. Others go down the tax route: the Irish version of JEPQ yields around 10% a year in dividends, but withholding tax takes a bite, and British companies with no withholding may be more attractive.
Some wouldn't put the whole prize into anything, however good the idea sounds. Prudence suggests a stroke of luck shouldn't turn into blind faith in a single product. And that's the open question: would you rather have a monthly income of nearly 4,000 euros with the uncertainty of an ETF, or manage it more sensibly?
Summary of a discussion on Burbuja.info - Foro de economía, actualidad y política., translated from Spanish and reviewed before publication.
Read the full discussion (30 replies).