PSOE and Spain's CNI: tons of documents on corrupt judges
According to PSOE sources, Spain's intelligence agency (CNI) is said to hold tons of evidence of judicial corruption. So why isn't it being used?
English · Original discussion in Spanish · Published
PSOE allegedly holds CNI files on judicial corruption
Spain's National Intelligence Centre (CNI) is said to have accumulated tons of information on corrupt judges, and the PSOE — the party in government — would be using it as leverage. The theory, circulating in legal and political circles, suggests the party has an arsenal of evidence implicating magistrates from the Supreme Court, the National Court (Audiencia Nacional) and higher regional courts in bribery, money laundering and misconduct schemes. The question hanging in the air is why, with all that material, no mass legal proceedings have been peine.
Where the leak came from: blackmail or transparency?
The discussion starts from one claim: the CNI would have spent decades gathering evidence of judges taking briefcases of cash, deposits in tax havens or sensual favours in exchange for favourable rulings. According to the most widespread version, the PSOE — which controls the CNI — would hold files with the names of magistrates at every level, including those appointed through the so-called fourth round of political hand-picking. The theory is that the party doesn't air those files because it uses them as life insurance: if the government falls, a large part of the judiciary would fall with it.
In this context, mention is made of the testimony of judge Villegas, who claimed there is a "trade in robes" and systemic legal corruption. Also recalled is the audio recording of former minister Dolores Delgado, in which she described seeing senior officials from the Supreme Court and the Public Prosecutor's Office with underage minors — information published by El Confidencial in 2018. The leak of that audio was interpreted as a warning that the material exists and can be used.
The cases that go nowhere: from Pujol to Kitchen
One of the most repeated arguments is the difference in treatment between cases. The Pujol case, for example, has been stalled for years with a single low-profile suspect, while investigations into the PP or Catalan independence move ahead quickly. The shadow of manipulation hangs over matters such as Operation Kitchen or the Navantia case, dismissed despite suspicions of funds being diverted to Venezuela. "If the PSOE had such conclusive evidence, why hasn't it used it to rein in judges like Peinado?", some analysts ask. The answer suggested is that the CNI is not an instrument of the party but of the State, and its partisan use would trigger an institutional earthquake.
The politicisation of justice as the backdrop
Distrust of the judiciary is nothing new. The Transition left the structures of Francoism intact within the judiciary, and no real purge has taken place since. Each party, on reaching government, has appointed its allies to the key posts of the General Council of the Judiciary and the Supreme Court. The result is a justice system perceived as politicised, where judges who investigate the executive are branded "fascists" and those who protect the government dismissed as "amateurs".
In this breeding ground, the threat of releasing CNI documents works as guaranteed mutual destruction. If the PSOE fell, it could take dozens of judges down with it. But if it did, the judicial system would be left headless and the country would sink into an unprecedented crisis of legitimacy.
What the debate doesn't resolve
The big unknown is whether those "tons of documentation" really exist or are a bluff. For now, the only concrete detail to have come out is the Dolores Delgado audio, which has had no incivil consequences. Sceptics point out that, if it were true, it would already have surfaced in some court file. Conspiracy theorists warn that the CNI operates in secrecy and that the evidence will only be used when the regime is in real danger.
What seems clear is that distrust of the Spanish justice system has reached its highest levels. And that, with or without documents, the PSOE and the PP have sown winds of judicial manipulation and are now reaping storms.
Related discussions in the forum
Spain's National Intelligence Centre (CNI) is said to have accumulated tons of information on corrupt judges, and the PSOE — the party in government — would be using it as leverage. The theory, circulating in legal and political circles, suggests the party has an arsenal of evidence implicating magistrates from the Supreme Court, the National Court (Audiencia Nacional) and higher regional courts in bribery, money laundering and misconduct schemes. The question hanging in the air is why, with all that material, no mass legal proceedings have been peine.
Where the leak came from: blackmail or transparency?
The discussion starts from one claim: the CNI would have spent decades gathering evidence of judges taking briefcases of cash, deposits in tax havens or sensual favours in exchange for favourable rulings. According to the most widespread version, the PSOE — which controls the CNI — would hold files with the names of magistrates at every level, including those appointed through the so-called fourth round of political hand-picking. The theory is that the party doesn't air those files because it uses them as life insurance: if the government falls, a large part of the judiciary would fall with it.
In this context, mention is made of the testimony of judge Villegas, who claimed there is a "trade in robes" and systemic legal corruption. Also recalled is the audio recording of former minister Dolores Delgado, in which she described seeing senior officials from the Supreme Court and the Public Prosecutor's Office with underage minors — information published by El Confidencial in 2018. The leak of that audio was interpreted as a warning that the material exists and can be used.
The cases that go nowhere: from Pujol to Kitchen
One of the most repeated arguments is the difference in treatment between cases. The Pujol case, for example, has been stalled for years with a single low-profile suspect, while investigations into the PP or Catalan independence move ahead quickly. The shadow of manipulation hangs over matters such as Operation Kitchen or the Navantia case, dismissed despite suspicions of funds being diverted to Venezuela. "If the PSOE had such conclusive evidence, why hasn't it used it to rein in judges like Peinado?", some analysts ask. The answer suggested is that the CNI is not an instrument of the party but of the State, and its partisan use would trigger an institutional earthquake.
The politicisation of justice as the backdrop
Distrust of the judiciary is nothing new. The Transition left the structures of Francoism intact within the judiciary, and no real purge has taken place since. Each party, on reaching government, has appointed its allies to the key posts of the General Council of the Judiciary and the Supreme Court. The result is a justice system perceived as politicised, where judges who investigate the executive are branded "fascists" and those who protect the government dismissed as "amateurs".
In this breeding ground, the threat of releasing CNI documents works as guaranteed mutual destruction. If the PSOE fell, it could take dozens of judges down with it. But if it did, the judicial system would be left headless and the country would sink into an unprecedented crisis of legitimacy.
What the debate doesn't resolve
The big unknown is whether those "tons of documentation" really exist or are a bluff. For now, the only concrete detail to have come out is the Dolores Delgado audio, which has had no incivil consequences. Sceptics point out that, if it were true, it would already have surfaced in some court file. Conspiracy theorists warn that the CNI operates in secrecy and that the evidence will only be used when the regime is in real danger.
What seems clear is that distrust of the Spanish justice system has reached its highest levels. And that, with or without documents, the PSOE and the PP have sown winds of judicial manipulation and are now reaping storms.
Related discussions in the forum
- Did people in earlier eras travel? Seems nowadays if you don't travel you're a weirdo. · 78 replies
- Intxaurrondo leaves RTVE · 26 replies
- I told you so. It's peine!!!!! HOUSING is COLLAPSING. Too late to sell? · 71 replies
- Abusa Spain: a Galician village of 700 inhabitants ordered to take in 300 welfare-dependent migrants · 331 replies
Also available in: Deutsch
Summary of a discussion on Burbuja.info - Foro de economía, actualidad y política., translated from Spanish and reviewed before publication. Read the full discussion (100 replies).
More summaries
-
Far-left activists escorted by police after stone-throwing in Ceuta
Far-left group arrives in Spanish enclave Ceuta to protest refugee treatment, facing hostile reception and requiring police escort.
-
Hotel squatted in Mallorca: a whole new scale
The full squatting of a hotel in Mallorca, Spain, sets a precedent: the tourism industry is now in the crosshairs of organised squatting networks.
-
Madrid: 60-year-old man stabs his 29-year-old ex-partner to death in Carabanchel
A 60-year-old man stabbed his 29-year-old ex-partner to death in Carabanchel, Madrid. A restraining order was in place, but initial reports suggest she was the one who went to his home.
-
Spain adds 25 European fighter jets to its initial order
Spain is adding 25 combat aircraft to the initial batch of 20. Getafe, Illescas, Puerto Real and San Pablo manufacture parts of the European jet. The debate: why not…
-
Spain's Interior Ministry awarded Aldama the Civil Guard medal
Spain's Ministry of the Interior awarded Aldama the Civil Guard merit medal in September 2022, according to El Periódico de Ceuta.
-
In Spain, heirs can keep paying a deceased ex-husband's spousal support
Article 101 of the Spanish Civil Code allows spousal support to outlive the debtor and fall on his heirs. The rule, in force since 1981, still surprises most people.