Postal vote ballot tampering in Spain: envelopes that give it away

Postal voting envelopes: printing error or ballot rigging?

A retired couple received a practically blank electoral envelope from the VOX party at their home. It was not an isolated mistake: dozens of citizens have reported differences in postal voting envelopes that would make it possible to identify how someone voted, a direct risk to ballot secrecy. The issue has peine the debate on the security of postal voting, a channel that has always been in the crosshairs of the most sceptical.

VOX's envelope, at the centre of the storm

While the envelopes from all other parties show visible printing marks (logos, colours), VOX's outer envelope arrived at homes practically blank. The difference is subtle but significant: if the envelope can be distinguished at a glance, whoever handles it during the postal process knows which party the vote is for. The law requires the outer envelope to be neutral to guarantee secrecy. If one is identifiable, whether intentionally or not, that principle is undermined.

The printer, however, has the easy explanation: it is a printing error. But those affected are not buying it. "90% of people will put their ballot into the envelope they received, and with that printing error you can tell who they voted for", sums up a technical analysis. The difference between a mistake and a deliberate manoeuvre is that the former gets repeated and corrected; this one seems to affect only one party.

Ban postal voting or accept the risk

The controversy has revived the voices calling for the abolition of postal voting. "Anyone so keen to vote should make the effort to go to the ballot box" is the radical stance. Others, more pragmatic, point out that the problem is not the channel itself but the lack of control over the material parties send out. If a PSOE envelope has a different mark from a PP one, the system cracks. And if VOX's is blank on top of that, the doubts multiply.

At the same time, proposals as simple as they are effective are emerging: that all voters put their ballot into an envelope from the same party, neutralising any mark. But in practice, citizens use the envelope they receive with the propaganda, without stopping to think whether it is legal or not.

With the envelopes already in voters' hands, the only certainty is that confidence in the postal system as a voting channel has taken another hit. And worst of all, as usual, the scandal will fizzle out with no consequences for those responsible, whether negligent printers or electoral strategists.

Related discussions in the forum

• Y Marc Vidal nos enseño su verdadera patita... · 23 replies
• Brvtal, los libro de historia ESO ahora dicen que los musulmanes entraron en españa amistosamente y con tolerancia y respeto a los cristianos · 193 replies
• La
  DGTes
  haciendo la vista fuerte con los segarro · 29 replies
• china en quiebra técnica no contrata trabajadores de 50 por que son muy viejos para trabajar pero son muy jóvenes para jubilarse. El chino listo: · 58 replies