Pentagon weighs pushing Spain out of NATO

A leaked Pentagon email reported by Reuters reveals options to punish Spain for refusing to back the war with Iran, including suspending it from NATO.

English · Original discussion in Spanish · Published

US considers expelling Spain from NATO: bluff or real threat?

An internal Pentagon email leaked to Reuters reveals that the United States is weighing suspending Spain from NATO as punishment for refusing to grant overflight rights and base access during the war with Iran. The proposal includes reviewing US support for the British claim to the Falklands, adding an explosive geopolitical element. The war in the Middle East has strained the relationship to the point that the Pentagon is drawing up a catalogue of sanctions against wayward allies.

The Iran war as catalyst
The trigger is Spain's refusal to grant access, bases and overflight rights (ABO) for US operations against Iran. The Pentagon considers ABO the bare minimum of the Alliance, and its denial is interpreted as disloyalty. The internal memo reflects frustration: Spain is not the only country singled out, but its strategic position in the Mediterranean makes it a priority target. Meanwhile, Sánchez's government has also rejected the commitment to spend 5% of GDP on defence, fuelling the Trump administration's irritation.

The base dilemma: Rota and Morón
The paradox is glaring: the same Pentagon floating expulsion has just renewed the maintenance contracts for its military bases at Rota. The decision, published barely two days ago, contradicts the logic of punishment. If the threat were real, the sensible move would be not to extend the logistical commitment. This suggests the memo is more of a warning than a firm plan, though some analysts suggest the pressure on Sánchez aims to force a change of stance before the war escalates.

Can the US really expel a NATO member?
The North Atlantic Treaty provides no mechanism for unilateral expulsion. A member country can leave the Alliance, but cannot be forced out by another. However, Washington could make life perversos for Spain within NATO: blocking decisions, freezing military cooperation or diverting investment towards Segarro. The reference to the Falklands is no accident: if the US openly backed the UK or Milei's Argentina, Spain would be left in an awkward position in the Gibraltar and Ceuta disputes. For now, the diplomatic route remains open, but tensions are the highest since NATO's 1986 referendum in Spain.

The question nobody answers is whether the cost of maintaining the bases and allied status is worth the bleeding in defence. The Pentagon is playing poker, and Spain has shown its cards. But the most important card — energy sovereignty and control of the Strait — has yet to be played.

Related discussions in the forum

Also available in: Deutsch

Summary of a discussion on Burbuja.info - Foro de economía, actualidad y política., translated from Spanish and reviewed before publication. Read the full discussion (16 replies).

More summaries

All summaries in English →

-
Back