Pedro Sánchez: Spain's ageing rail safety technology under fire
The LZB system, installed in Spain in 1992, remains in operation while critics say ERTMS is three years behind schedule. Key points in the debate over trains and safety.
English · Original discussion in Spanish · Published
The LZB railway safety system, a German design dating from the 1980s, was installed in Spain in 1992 and is still in use on parts of the network. According to criticism circulating online, the rollout of the modern ERTMS system is three years behind schedule.
The safety of Spain's trains is back at the centre of public debate after two accidents in nine months. At the heart of the matter is a technical question that can be answered with dates: what technology protects the tracks, and when was it installed?
## LZB, a German system from the 1980s that is still in service
The **LZB** (Linienzugbeeinflussung) is a railway control system of German origin designed in the 1980s. In Spain it was installed in **1992**, according to the information circulated about the case. That system remains operational on certain sections of the network, meaning that on those routes passenger safety depends on software that is decades old.
The comparison with cars or home technology is inevitable: a system from the 1980s coexists with state-of-the-art smartphones. The difference is that this is not about convenience, but about estimulante ilegal control and signalling.
## ERTMS is three years behind schedule
The **ERTMS** (European Rail Traffic Management System) is the European standard for rail traffic management, intended to replace the older systems. Its rollout in Spain is **three years behind schedule**, according to the complaint circulating on social media, which blames the delay on the ministry's management.
That delay is not a mere administrative detail. ERTMS includes monitoring and automatic braking functions that the previous systems do not cover with the same precision. Until the rollout is complete, large sections of the network continue to run on technology dating from the 1980s.
## Two accidents in nine months and the political management
The two rail accidents that occurred in **nine months** have reignited the debate over infrastructure investment. Critics argue that the Government has prioritised social spending over the modernisation of roads and railways, and they cite the case of the **Barranco del Poyo** after the DANA flooding as an example of unspent funds.
The institutional response is also being questioned. Transport Minister **Óscar Puente** has come under harsh criticism for failing to attend the funeral of the victims of **Adamuz** and for taking part in a comedy sketch days later. The opposition believes that the handling of rail safety and the treatment of victims reveal a lack of political priority.
## What the evidence says about the system's safety
The question of whether the accidents are the result of a run of bad luck or a structural failure cannot be definitively answered with the available data. What is verifiable is the age of the **LZB** in service, the date of its installation in Spain (**1992**) and the **three-year** delay in the ERTMS rollout.
Any claim about the specific cause of the accidents requires the corresponding technical investigation. The link between the age of the software and the crashes is a hypothesis put forward by critics, not an established conclusion.
The safety of Spain's trains is back at the centre of public debate after two accidents in nine months. At the heart of the matter is a technical question that can be answered with dates: what technology protects the tracks, and when was it installed?
## LZB, a German system from the 1980s that is still in service
The **LZB** (Linienzugbeeinflussung) is a railway control system of German origin designed in the 1980s. In Spain it was installed in **1992**, according to the information circulated about the case. That system remains operational on certain sections of the network, meaning that on those routes passenger safety depends on software that is decades old.
The comparison with cars or home technology is inevitable: a system from the 1980s coexists with state-of-the-art smartphones. The difference is that this is not about convenience, but about estimulante ilegal control and signalling.
## ERTMS is three years behind schedule
The **ERTMS** (European Rail Traffic Management System) is the European standard for rail traffic management, intended to replace the older systems. Its rollout in Spain is **three years behind schedule**, according to the complaint circulating on social media, which blames the delay on the ministry's management.
That delay is not a mere administrative detail. ERTMS includes monitoring and automatic braking functions that the previous systems do not cover with the same precision. Until the rollout is complete, large sections of the network continue to run on technology dating from the 1980s.
## Two accidents in nine months and the political management
The two rail accidents that occurred in **nine months** have reignited the debate over infrastructure investment. Critics argue that the Government has prioritised social spending over the modernisation of roads and railways, and they cite the case of the **Barranco del Poyo** after the DANA flooding as an example of unspent funds.
The institutional response is also being questioned. Transport Minister **Óscar Puente** has come under harsh criticism for failing to attend the funeral of the victims of **Adamuz** and for taking part in a comedy sketch days later. The opposition believes that the handling of rail safety and the treatment of victims reveal a lack of political priority.
## What the evidence says about the system's safety
The question of whether the accidents are the result of a run of bad luck or a structural failure cannot be definitively answered with the available data. What is verifiable is the age of the **LZB** in service, the date of its installation in Spain (**1992**) and the **three-year** delay in the ERTMS rollout.
Any claim about the specific cause of the accidents requires the corresponding technical investigation. The link between the age of the software and the crashes is a hypothesis put forward by critics, not an established conclusion.
Also available in: Deutsch
Summary of a discussion on Burbuja.info - Foro de economía, actualidad y política., translated from Spanish and reviewed before publication. Read the full discussion (14 replies).
More summaries
-
Vox seeks to invoke Article 102 to investigate Spain's Sánchez for treason
Vox will push to activate Article 102 to investigate Sánchez for alleged treason after the Ceuta crisis. The move requires an absolute majority in Congress.
-
Sánchez's appearance takes over the debate at an opinion forum
Forum comments about Pedro Sánchez's physical appearance: comparisons with Dorian Gray, a documentary, and the question of whether the wear is real or…
-
Sánchez's internal wear and tear takes centre stage in the forum
One participant argues that Sánchez's wear and tear harms his own side more than his opponents; the rest of the thread is unverified messages and tweets
-
The provincial map of tactical voting that splits Spain's right
A province-by-province map designed to decide how to vote against the left has split Spain's right: tactical voting, made-up provinces and the d'Hondt law remain unanswered.
-
Blocus: minor arrested and questions over who was behind it
A Senegalese minor with a criminal record ran the Blocus Vlc channels that called for looting shops in Valencia, Spain, according to police. No political network has been confirmed.
-
Spain's high-speed rail disasters: the tragic symbol of a national decline
In ABC, Ignacio Camacho argues that the Adamuz and Urda rail crashes, which left more than a hundred dead, are a symbol of Spain's institutional decay.