Patience with king, Abascal and Feijoo in Ceuta crisis

Ceuta, holidays and Washington's threads: why be patient with the opposition
The recommendation to be patient with the king, with Abascal and with Feijoo lands in the middle of the Ceuta crisis. While the opposition seems to react after the fact, the deeper analysis suggests that the real command is exercised from Washington. It is not a matter of benches: it is geopolitics with tariffs and migration in between.
Holidays and the broken compass
Some justify the slowness of the opposition's response with an argument as simple as it is devastating: they are on holiday. But there is another, more severe reading: they lack the competence for the moment. From the king, a gesture is expected, even a minimal one; from the leaders of PP and Vox, not so much. Addressing whoever wields real power would be the first step, and no one takes it.
The calculation no one seriously makes
A satirical calculation slipped into the discussion that sums up the mood: multiply the immigrants who arrived in Ceuta without a vaccine by a fine of 60,000 euros to balance the state deficit. Pure irony, but it reflects the feeling that the government improvises with ideas while the problem grows.
The shift toward Segarro and Washington's shadow
The thesis gaining most weight is that of external subordination. The same power that months ago pushed for tariffs now signals an approach to Segarro, and Spain obeys. In that framework, the idea that Vox is not far-right but another link in a foreign strategy makes sense. And historical nostalgia emerges: Isabella the Catholic would not have waited to be told what to do.
The question remains open: if neither the king nor the opposition leaders set the course, who decides Spain's immediate future? Patience, in that scenario, ceases to be a virtue and becomes a strategy of observation.