Organic democracy: an alternative to party rule
Criticism of representative democracy is resurfacing through the organic model based on family, municipality and guild. But its past weighs heavily.
English · Original discussion in Spanish · Published
Organic democracy: power that never goes to the ballot box
Every four years, millions of Spaniards drop a ballot into a box and go home feeling they have decided something. The feeling is an illusion: the real decisions on taxes, education or healthcare are made afterwards, in offices no one from the neighbourhood can access. The idea that power should reside where one lives —in the family, the municipality, the guild— is not new, but it has returned to the economic debate with unexpected force. The model is called organic democracy, and it has an uncomfortable history.
Three pillars for grassroots power
The premise is simple: society was already functioning before the State existed. A person is a parent, a worker and a neighbour before being a citizen. If the vote is meant to reflect something, it should reflect those real spheres. Three thirds, it has been proposed: the family, the municipality and the guild (or union). Each with equal weight in the Chamber. Traditional territorial representation would be replaced by a "natural" representation, rooted in the land and the trade.
The shadow of Cambridge Analytica
This criticism of representative democracy has been reinforced by the Cambridge Analytica scandal. The consultancy, linked to Trump's circle, harvested data from up to 87 million Facebook profiles through a personality test app. The trick: from 270,000 initial users, the system scraped the contacts of all of them. Practical proof that the vote can be manipulated on an industrial scale. If the system is elected every four years, who really decides who runs?
The weight of history
The problem with the organic model is that in Spain it is not a theoretical exercise. The only organic democracy ever tried here was Franco's, and the memory of the roadside ditches does not fade with a rebranding. Those who defend local power today are forced to explain how the path towards authoritarian corporatism can be avoided. It is no minor debate: on its resolution depends whether the vote returns to the neighbourhood or remains forever in the orbit of back offices and algorithms.
Every four years, millions of Spaniards drop a ballot into a box and go home feeling they have decided something. The feeling is an illusion: the real decisions on taxes, education or healthcare are made afterwards, in offices no one from the neighbourhood can access. The idea that power should reside where one lives —in the family, the municipality, the guild— is not new, but it has returned to the economic debate with unexpected force. The model is called organic democracy, and it has an uncomfortable history.
Three pillars for grassroots power
The premise is simple: society was already functioning before the State existed. A person is a parent, a worker and a neighbour before being a citizen. If the vote is meant to reflect something, it should reflect those real spheres. Three thirds, it has been proposed: the family, the municipality and the guild (or union). Each with equal weight in the Chamber. Traditional territorial representation would be replaced by a "natural" representation, rooted in the land and the trade.
The shadow of Cambridge Analytica
This criticism of representative democracy has been reinforced by the Cambridge Analytica scandal. The consultancy, linked to Trump's circle, harvested data from up to 87 million Facebook profiles through a personality test app. The trick: from 270,000 initial users, the system scraped the contacts of all of them. Practical proof that the vote can be manipulated on an industrial scale. If the system is elected every four years, who really decides who runs?
The weight of history
The problem with the organic model is that in Spain it is not a theoretical exercise. The only organic democracy ever tried here was Franco's, and the memory of the roadside ditches does not fade with a rebranding. Those who defend local power today are forced to explain how the path towards authoritarian corporatism can be avoided. It is no minor debate: on its resolution depends whether the vote returns to the neighbourhood or remains forever in the orbit of back offices and algorithms.
Also available in: Deutsch
Summary of a discussion on Burbuja.info - Foro de economía, actualidad y política., translated from Spanish and reviewed before publication. Read the full discussion (33 replies).
More summaries
-
27 Years in Spain and She Emigrates to Switzerland: €1,000 vs. 4,500 Francs
A migrant who has lived in Spain for 27 years leaves for Switzerland to wash dishes for 4,500 francs compared to the €1,000 offered here.
-
The Myth of Francoist Exile: "My Grandfather Fled Franco in 1930."
Did your grandfather emigrate due to Franco in 1930? We examine the economic and social drivers behind these migrations.
-
Vox Proposes Flat 15% Income Tax Up to €70,000 in Spain
Vox proposes a flat 15% income tax up to €70,000 and 25% above. Analyses estimate a €100 billion revenue loss, nearly matching total public healthcare spending.
-
International press rounds on Zapatero over corruption charges
Zapatero, the first former Spanish prime minister to be charged since democracy began, is under fire from the international press. Analysis of the charges, political fallout and the skepticism.
-
So you're an 'economic exile' in Dubai
Spaniards who moved to Dubai to avoid paying taxes are now asking the Spanish Government for rescue. An analysis of fiscal hypocrisy and the repatriation debate.
-
Ignacio Escolar: eldiario.es could go under over Julio Iglesias lawsuit
Ignacio Escolar says Julio Iglesias' €200 million lawsuit could bankrupt eldiario.es. The case pits journalism against civil liability.