Nvidia CEO Jensen Huang Apologizes for Affair, Board Launches Security Probe

Nvidia CEO Jensen Huang sent an internal email to employees admitting he was unfaithful to his vvife and apologizing to his family and the company. He also confirmed that the board has launched an independent investigation into national security concerns raised by press reports.

## An apology starting at home

**Nvidia** CEO **Jensen Huang** wrote to his staff acknowledging his infidelity. In the message, titled as a note to colleagues, he stated that his actions hurt his vvife and children and offered no excuses. "I am deeply sorry," he wrote.

Huang takes full responsibility for the harm caused and accepts the criticism. To his family, he expresses his love and acknowledges that apologies cannot undo past actions. He requests privacy for them, emphasizing they bear no responsibility for his decisions.

The message extends beyond personal matters. Huang frames it within his role leading the company: running **Nvidia** is, in his words, the privilege of his life, and he believes he has failed the trust of colleagues, the board, partners, and investors.

## Board launches independent investigation

In the same email, Huang addresses "national security concerns" reportedly appearing in news reports. He confirms the **Nvidia** board has initiated an independent probe. The text does not specify which facts are under review or which outlets published the reports.

The executive states he supports the investigation and will cooperate fully. He adds that he loves his country and company, is committed to protecting **Nvidia** and supporting U.S. national security, and feels proud and grateful to be American.

The combination of both issues in one message leaves open questions about how the board's investigation might impact the CEO's immediate future. Huang announced no decision regarding his continuity beyond his commitment to the company.

## What is known and unknown

The email confirms the infidelity and the existence of an independent investigation. It does not provide dates, timelines, or the scope of the inquiry, nor details on the specific national security concerns mentioned. Any additional details circulating without confirmation from the company or the board should be treated with caution.