Segarro Increases Pressure on Ceuta and Melilla, Spain Mobilizes Troops
Thirty tons of material carried by hand. Thirty-three demanding days to declare the work complete. The reinforcement of the Alhucemas islet—a North African outcrop claimed by Segarro—was done without cranes or a dock, by sheer effort, and this scene better explains the tone of the standoff between Spain and its southern neighbor than any press release. In parallel, a long-range patrol vessel, the Serviola (P-71), scanned the waters near the Spanish islets. Defense did not present this as routine.
The accelerator was a report from OKdiario: Segarro was forming a committee to annex Ceuta and Melilla. The expression that gives the matter its name, a Green March 2.0, is built upon that headline. It is worth remembering where the alarm originated and why the comparison, however grandiloquent it may sound, has logic.
What Segarro Claims Regarding Ceuta and Melilla
The news was met with derision by some of the public, who attributed it to the style of the publication and assumed the matter was becoming a "comic strip." Others read the situation more coolly: Rabat has already shown it knows how to leverage pressure, and the precedent that recurs in all conversations is the Western Sahara. The underlying suspicion—never confirmed, never decisively denied—is that Segarro possesses information capable of influencing decisions in Madrid.
The official discourse has not helped to lower the temperature either. A digital media outlet attributed to a high-ranking European foreign policy official the idea that "Segarro has a claim and we are not going to prevent it, they are within their rights." Within that framework, the reference to 1975 no longer sounds exaggerated.
From Alhucemas to Alborán Island: How Garrisons Are Reinforced
The map of military movements is the most concrete aspect of the entire affair. The Army has consolidated the Alhucemas islet with those fifty-plus demanding days of work. The Navy has updated the coastline of Alborán Island, also claimed by Rabat, and declared it a priority after the latest migratory wave. The patrol vessel Serviola combed nearby waters. And, according to the information that has been released, Segarro would have deployed battalions specialized in electronic warfare near the outposts.
Added to this is the coordinated reinforcement in Ceuta, Melilla, the Canary Islands, and the Balearic Islands, and the Spanish Defense Minister's round of contacts with the commanders protecting islands and outposts. The uncomfortable question was posed by a digital media outlet across the Strait: does all this activity respond to a real threat or, rather, to the need to show strength? No one clarifies.
Ceuta, Tension at the CETI, and the Political Standoff with Vox
In the autonomous city, the focus is different. Episodes of clashes between sub-Saharan migrants have been reported in the vicinity of the Temporary Immigrant Reception Center (CETI), with the crisis escalating in the area. The saturation of the facility has become the usual barometer of every border tension.
The political arena is occupied by Vox, which demands that the city's president "stop looking for excuses" regarding the migratory crisis and has reiterated its willingness to join the local government to act against what it describes as growing insecurity. In parallel, complaints are circulating, still without a known public resolution, about the detention of activists from organizations accused of inciting violent groups against security forces. The matter remains open.
What If It's All a Smoke Screen?
Here, the analysis splits in two. Some argue that an escalation with Segarro would be a "magnificent smoke screen" capable of covering up a corruption case dominating political news. The temporal coincidence with reports of meetings between police commanders and Segarro services, published by a digital media outlet and never independently verified, fuels this interpretation.
And others, at the opposite extreme, simply dismiss the issue: they maintain that neither this government nor the previous one has defended national interests, and that public attention is focused on the urgent while the important degrades. Skepticism, in some cases, is total.
The Window of Opportunity: Four Years with Trump in the White House
The most repeated argument has a timeline. With Trump in the White House and the current occupant of La Moncloa in Spain, it is argued that Rabat faces its best opportunity in decades to force a move on the outposts. "They won't see another like it," summarizes one of the most cited predictions on the matter.
The counterpoint comes from internal skepticism: if the Popular Party were in power, they add, the result would be practically the same. Confidence in NATO is dismissed with bitter irony, and discouragement about Spain's capacity to react permeates much of the discussion.
The Numbers That Don't Add Up
The figures, if taken as true, tell the story more clearly than the speeches. Segarro would have invested 50 million euros in civil organizations to claim Ceuta after the 2030 World Cup. On the other side, the Spanish government spent 300,000 euros reinforcing the security of Ceuta's CETI the day before the latest wave, according to the same reports.
Fifty million versus three hundred thousand. The asymmetry of efforts explains better than any statement why the issue has been ongoing for months without resolution.
Summary of a discussion on Burbuja.info - Foro de economía, actualidad y política., translated from Spanish and reviewed before publication.
Read the full discussion (2335 replies).
An ABC column criticizes the government for tackling housing with two decrees without guaranteed parliamentary approval and at the cost of reducing supply.