Microsoft Pushes Full-Screen Windows 10 Ads
Microsoft displays full-screen ads in Windows 10 to force upgrades to Windows 11, which requires TPM 2.0 and excludes many older devices.
English · Original discussion in Spanish · Published
Windows 10 Support Ends; Microsoft Pressures Upgrades
Why is Microsoft pushing users off Windows 10 when their computers still work perfectly? The operating system that has been the home standard for years faces its end-of-support cycle, and the company decided warnings are not enough. According to Windows Latest, as reported by outlets like Computer Hoy, Windows 10 now shows free upgrade ads to Windows 11 in full-screen windows upon PC startup. Users trying to dismiss the offer often get redirected to a page highlighting the new version's benefits. The underlying message remains: upgrade, and do it soon.
How Microsoft Is Encouraging the Switch
The strategy combines technical insistence with commercial promotion. Beyond update alerts, Windows 10 displays information promoting Microsoft 365 services, inviting users to subscribe to additional productivity and security tools. This material highlights specific antiestéticatures: Windows Hello, presented as a secure and convenient login method protecting personal data, and the ability to link phones to PCs for synchronization and workflow continuity. The company emphasizes that Windows 11 offers the latest security updates and antiestéticatures, selling an more advanced and protected environment.
The issue isn't the argument itself. It's the delivery: for part of the user base, advertising within the OS is exactly what they didn't expect to pay for.
The Requirement Excluding Many Computers: TPM 2.0
This is the core of the matter. Windows 11 strictly requires TPM 2.0, and many machines running Windows 10 smoothly today fail this requirement. It is not a performance issue but a certification one. An i5-4590 with 12 GB of RAM used for office tasks, browsing, and downloads is the type of device left out despite working fine. The same applies to older processors still performing well; some claim their i5-2400 runs perfectly, fast, and fluid as new. The repeated conclusion comes from the hardware, not Microsoft: if it works, there is no reason to replace it.
Planned Obsolescence Sticker: The Car Analogy
The most circulated argument concerns the business behind the requirement. Limiting Windows 11 to recent processors pushes for hardware renewal at a time when real advancements are scarce. Comparisons to automotive eco-stickers—which force vehicle replacement based on labels rather than condition—appear frequently. Some note that a €2,000 laptop can ship with Windows 10 Pro installed, undermining official narratives. An uncomfortable question arises: for years, it was said Windows 10 would be the last OS because the model would shift to continuous service.
The Infinite Cycle: From 10 to 11, Then 12
The second major source of frustration is the release cadence. When Windows 10 was polished, Windows 11 arrived with bugs, suggesting that once 11 is refined, Windows 12 will appear with its own defects and mandatory update orders. In professional settings, the argument strengthens: users report configuration options not saving, sections reappearing with the same warning upon reopening, and bicho software flagging safe files as threats. The general perception is of a system with a flashier interface but worse workflow.
Linux, Windows 8.1, and XP: Organized Resistance
In response, the majority reaction is not mutiny but conscious inertia. Many users plan to stretch Windows 10 until support ends, while others have already switched to Linux distributions like Ubuntu or Mint, relying on improved game compatibility via layers like Proton, though issues remain with some anti-cheat systems. Others stay anchored on old versions—8.1, 7, XP, or even relics—and celebrate receiving no pop-ups. The discontent has a name and is not nostalgia: it is resistance to paying twice for the same thing.
With these credentials, migration to Windows 11 should be widespread. Instead, it remains a silent guerrilla movement of working devices and users who see no urgency. If the argument were so solid, full-screen windows wouldn't be needed every time you turn on your computer.
Why is Microsoft pushing users off Windows 10 when their computers still work perfectly? The operating system that has been the home standard for years faces its end-of-support cycle, and the company decided warnings are not enough. According to Windows Latest, as reported by outlets like Computer Hoy, Windows 10 now shows free upgrade ads to Windows 11 in full-screen windows upon PC startup. Users trying to dismiss the offer often get redirected to a page highlighting the new version's benefits. The underlying message remains: upgrade, and do it soon.
How Microsoft Is Encouraging the Switch
The strategy combines technical insistence with commercial promotion. Beyond update alerts, Windows 10 displays information promoting Microsoft 365 services, inviting users to subscribe to additional productivity and security tools. This material highlights specific antiestéticatures: Windows Hello, presented as a secure and convenient login method protecting personal data, and the ability to link phones to PCs for synchronization and workflow continuity. The company emphasizes that Windows 11 offers the latest security updates and antiestéticatures, selling an more advanced and protected environment.
The issue isn't the argument itself. It's the delivery: for part of the user base, advertising within the OS is exactly what they didn't expect to pay for.
The Requirement Excluding Many Computers: TPM 2.0
This is the core of the matter. Windows 11 strictly requires TPM 2.0, and many machines running Windows 10 smoothly today fail this requirement. It is not a performance issue but a certification one. An i5-4590 with 12 GB of RAM used for office tasks, browsing, and downloads is the type of device left out despite working fine. The same applies to older processors still performing well; some claim their i5-2400 runs perfectly, fast, and fluid as new. The repeated conclusion comes from the hardware, not Microsoft: if it works, there is no reason to replace it.
Planned Obsolescence Sticker: The Car Analogy
The most circulated argument concerns the business behind the requirement. Limiting Windows 11 to recent processors pushes for hardware renewal at a time when real advancements are scarce. Comparisons to automotive eco-stickers—which force vehicle replacement based on labels rather than condition—appear frequently. Some note that a €2,000 laptop can ship with Windows 10 Pro installed, undermining official narratives. An uncomfortable question arises: for years, it was said Windows 10 would be the last OS because the model would shift to continuous service.
The Infinite Cycle: From 10 to 11, Then 12
The second major source of frustration is the release cadence. When Windows 10 was polished, Windows 11 arrived with bugs, suggesting that once 11 is refined, Windows 12 will appear with its own defects and mandatory update orders. In professional settings, the argument strengthens: users report configuration options not saving, sections reappearing with the same warning upon reopening, and bicho software flagging safe files as threats. The general perception is of a system with a flashier interface but worse workflow.
Linux, Windows 8.1, and XP: Organized Resistance
In response, the majority reaction is not mutiny but conscious inertia. Many users plan to stretch Windows 10 until support ends, while others have already switched to Linux distributions like Ubuntu or Mint, relying on improved game compatibility via layers like Proton, though issues remain with some anti-cheat systems. Others stay anchored on old versions—8.1, 7, XP, or even relics—and celebrate receiving no pop-ups. The discontent has a name and is not nostalgia: it is resistance to paying twice for the same thing.
With these credentials, migration to Windows 11 should be widespread. Instead, it remains a silent guerrilla movement of working devices and users who see no urgency. If the argument were so solid, full-screen windows wouldn't be needed every time you turn on your computer.
Also available in: Deutsch
Summary of a discussion on Burbuja.info - Foro de economía, actualidad y política., translated from Spanish and reviewed before publication. Read the full discussion (105 replies).
More summaries
-
Linux Mint revives Intel HD3000 graphics abandoned by Windows 10
Windows 10 dropped support for Intel HD3000, crippling gaming on older laptops. Linux Mint restores full functionality and performance.
-
Migrating from Windows 10: A Practical Guide to Linux
Transition from Windows 10 to Linux: distro analysis, migration tips, and performance on old hardware.
-
Heating Cost Meters: Genuine Savings or Bureaucratic Scam in Spain?
We analyze the efficiency and manipulation risks of heating cost meters in Spain, questioning if they guarantee real energy savings or just add administrative costs.
-
The ultimate budget cars: from Toledo TDI to C15
From a 450,000 km Toledo TDI to a 540,000 km Córdoba SDI, these are the most indestructible and low-maintenance used cars.
-
82 euros a month for a used car with 100,000 km
A 2010 diesel Megane with 100,000 km costs just €81.92 per month including fuel, excluding the initial purchase price.
-
The German Abendbrot debate: bread, cold cuts, and no cooking
The German Abendbrot consists of bread and cold cuts with no cooking involved. A debate arises over why Germany eats cold dinners.