You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly. You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
Michael Saylor and the 17,000 bitcoins he plans to 'burn' when he dies
A viral tweet claimed Michael Saylor would burn 17,000 bitcoins to create a supply shock. The reality is less explosive: he plans to destroy his private keys upon his death.
Michael Saylor and the controversy over the 17,000 'burned' bitcoins
A tweet from @CryptocapoOO has stirred up the crypto world: it claimed that Michael Saylor, chairman of Strategy (formerly MicroStrategy), was going to 'burn' 17,000 bitcoins to trigger the biggest supply shock in history. The news spread like wildfire, but the reality, as almost always, is less dramatic.
The reality behind the sensationalism
What Saylor has said on several occasions is that he plans to destroy the private keys to his roughly 17,000 personal BTC when he dies (or even earlier) as a legacy. It is not an active burn, but a virtual disappearance that would only occur upon his death. In the meantime, those bitcoins remain in his possession. The company, for its part, holds around 846,000 corporate BTC, but no burn of those has been mentioned.
Criticism of Saylor
The move does not convince everyone. Critics point out that Saylor's financial strategy is fragile: the preferred shares he uses to finance his bitcoin purchases trade below their nominal value, and the company is running losses. "If the strategy is so good, let him burn the 800,000 corporate bitcoins — he won't dare do that," the argument goes. Others dismiss him as a fanatic of the book 'The Bitcoin Standard' and believe he is chasing a headline rather than real change.
In short, the original tweet was sensationalist. The burn of 17,000 BTC, if it ever happens, would be a symbolic gesture, not a market cataclysm. Only time will tell whether Saylor keeps his posthumous promise or whether it was just noise.
Summary of a discussion on Burbuja.info - Foro de economía, actualidad y política., translated from Spanish and reviewed before publication.
Read the full discussion (14 replies).