Meta: From Sell Signal at $134 to Rally Toward $1,000

Meta dropped 20% and analysts urged selling at $134. Years later, it has gained over 600% and is heading toward $1,000.

English · Original discussion in Spanish · Published

Meta: From Sell Signal at $134 to Rally Toward $1,000
From the advice to sell Meta at $134 to a 600% surge

How can a stock crash by 20% and then multiply its value several times over years? This question captures the paradox surrounding Meta, Facebook's parent company, since poor results sent it plunging in the markets. At that time, with shares around $134, voices urging investors to flee were plentiful: the metaverse seemed like a bottomless pit, ad revenue was stagnating, and the market punished every promise of virtual worlds.

Time shifted the equation. Meta did not sink. It went from $134 to $284, tripling from the most pessimistic analyses, and accumulating more than 600% from the starting point of that 20% drop. The stock is now heading toward $1,000. Those who sold, sold. Those who held on have reasons to smile.

Why did Meta fall 20%?

The crash caught everyone off guard. The surprise was how a company with such massive business volume could lose 20% of its value in days. Among circulating explanations, two stood out: the bet on the metaverse as a massive diversion of resources and the perception that internal management lacked clear direction. The quarterly result, weaker than expected, completed the picture.

Even those who didn't trinc the company looked closer. The scene recalled classic tech crashes: prior euphoria, brutal correction, and a legion of analysts rapidly revising price targets. The recurring joke was that everything remained "normal, keep moving".

The metaverse bet: a product ahead of its time

One widely repeated argument holds that the metaverse isn't a bad product, but one poorly timed. The thesis: if virtual reality glasses had launched in 2019 or 2024, the company might have succeeded just as it did with Facebook. Releasing them during an advertising storm was a mistake of timing, not vision.

Opposing this is another argument. The metaverse isn't new: Second Life explored this ground years ago, and people got bored. Dozens of better open worlds exist, yet none have triumphed. That line concludes Meta would suffer the same fate, no matter how much immersion or glasses it adds. Disdain for its graphical finish was unanimous here: it induced second-hand embarrassment, they summarized.

The question that dismantles panic: where does the money come from?

Here lies the key many ignored. If a company faces a crisis, what does it cut first? And based on that, what actually sustains Meta? The answer is uncomfortable for the doomsday narrative: the business is advertising. Social networks are merely platforms for segmented, personalized ads. Facebook and Instagram aren't the product; they're the medium.

Added to this is a less-known pillar. Meta controls 40% of the fiber-optic cables crossing oceans, infrastructure handling much of global traffic. Reducing the company to a teen social network misses the bigger picture. Diversification, though invisible, supports much of its value, defenders of buying argue.

Wear and tear: TikTok, Apple, and competition

Skepticism had hard arguments. Young people stopped opening Facebook accounts years ago, and TikTok is eating Instagram's ground ad by ad. Competitive pressure is real and isn't solved by a product update.

Another blow came from Cupertino. Apple's privacy changes restricted user ad tracking, damaging Meta's ability to segment ads and maximize each impression. Together, these pressures explain why the company urgently sought a new mass-use platform to rebuild its ad model.

From $134 to nearly $1,000: the resurrection

Stock history defies the panic manual. Recommending selling at $134 was, in hindsight, the worst possible advice: shares later hit $284 and kept climbing. Current calculations speak of a 3x gain from 2022 analyses and over 600% since that downturn began.

Some even claimed big investors sold above $300 and might rebuy between $80 and $100. Subsequent prices never touched that range again: they kept rising.

The detail unsettling bears: periodically, new stories emerge—fines, scandals, a supposed bubble about to burst—and reality has shown Meta is one of the US's strongest companies. Those who haven't bought yet, say bulls, will get another chance.

The debate over who gave bad vs. good advice remains open and won't be settled by data: in markets, each success seems to confirm a theory, while errors are blamed on bad luck. Meanwhile, the stock keeps rising.

Someone, in October 2022, sold their shares near $134 convinced they'd dodged disaster. Today they watch the price heading toward $1,000 and likely have a story to tell. Or perhaps prefer not to.

Also available in: Deutsch

Summary of a discussion on Burbuja.info - Foro de economía, actualidad y política., translated from Spanish and reviewed before publication. Read the full discussion (111 replies).

More summaries

All summaries in English →

-
Back