Melilla's 1970 fence: 1.20 metres that actually worked
In 1970, the Melilla border in Spain was protected by a fence barely 1.20 metres high and a single legionnaire armed with a CETME rifle and 80 rounds. It worked. The paradox: while today six-metre walls are being built and electronic systems deployed that fail to contain migratory pressure, half a century ago a simple wire fence and one soldier were enough. The explanation lies not in the height of the fence, but in the economic context.
The dictatorship and Spanish emigration
Spain was then a poor country under a dictatorship. More than two million Spaniards had emigrated to Europe in search of work. There was no free movement within the EU – Spain was not even a member of the Community – nor did the welfare state that attracts migrants today exist. The fence stopped no one because there were no incentives to cross. As the analyses point out, the real barrier was economic.
The myth of military deterrence
Some argue that its effectiveness was due to the toughness of the legionnaire, ready to shoot without hesitation. Anecdotes from the era – such as the order to 'not seek it, but not lose it' – feed that view. Yet Spain's shock troops failed to prevent the loss of Ifni (1969) or the Sahara (1975). A border is no stronger than the will of the people defending it, but neither is it stronger than the prosperity the enemy seeks.
From wire fence to fortress: an economic mirror
The contrast with today is stark. The same place, 50 years later, has six-metre fences, razor wire, sensors and Civil Guard officers. Crossings happen en masse. The change is not in border technology, but in the appeal of the other side. Spain went from being a country of emigration to one of immigration when its economy converged with Europe's and a welfare system was established. The 1970 fence was not more effective; it simply had no work to do.
The lesson is uncomfortable for those seeking technical solutions to human problems: a border is worth what the well-being it protects is worth. The 1970 fence did not protect against poverty, because poverty was on the inside. Today, the wall faces wealth. And wealth calls.
Related discussions in the forum