Mario Conde: Hidden Elite Knowledge and Its Cost

Hidden Knowledge: The Unmapped Summit of Power

Is there a body of reserved wisdom, passed down for centuries outside official channels? This ancient question resurfaces whenever prominent figures discuss Templars, high-degree Guasons, and discreet societies. Former banker Mario Conde recently revived it with a simple yet hard-to-digest thesis: we are not at the top of the pyramid; something above directs our destinies through intermediaries.

The standard rebuttal is clear: hidden, yes; magical, no. This distinction matters. What we call hidden knowledge may simply be misunderstood reality: fundamental questions about existence sidelined by trivial pursuits. The interview, antiestéticaturing Conde speaking freely in his later years, has become cult material among those skeptical of the official narrative.

From Shanghai Top 500 to a 1781 Weimar Memoir

Denying closed knowledge circuits is as naive as assuming everything is online. The debate shifts to academia: some claim reserved knowledge now resides in Shanghai Top 500 ranking faculties, where honorary doctorates unlock restricted materials. Arguments rely on partially verifiable facts: university libraries with access-restricted 19th-century collections and unpublished doctoral theses.

Conspiracy or academic bureaucracy? It could be both. Lodges' documented interest in occult sciences and philosophy is real, but doesn't make such knowledge inherently evil. Problems arise when secrecy serves as proof of power.

Accounts of true authority vary. A recurring theory claims Jesuits invented symbolic Freemasonry in the 18th century to combat Protestantism, citing a memoir edited in Weimar in 1781 by a high dignitary of the Strict Observance. Others note centuries of Jesuit-Guason hostility, making creation unlikely. The Library of Alexandria, before burning, is cited as a repository of unthinkable things; from its ashes, another line suggests, emerged the three Abrahamic religions, all dedicated to shepherding masses.

Is School a Cage for Training Instead of Teaching?

The most agreed-upon aspect isn't esoteric, but educational. The accusation is stark: schools function as traps designed to alienate children and prevent true wisdom. Evidence cited isn't reports, but experience: no adult uses the greatest common divisor, yet children endure physics and chemistry at twelve.

The parallel is explicit: elephant calves tied to posts. They pull, fail, and as adults don't try again despite strength. Trained individuals can't find food, depend on providers, and obey out of hunger and thirst. The result, argued, is a flock needing no permanent surveillance.

A harsher variant exists: families have long transmitted survival skills to their children, surpassing others. Meanwhile, others send theirs to school to be deformed.

Saturn, the Demiurge, and Symbolic Sacrifices

Astrological layers emerge here. Some claim YHWH is Saturn, the great malefic, and Christ's sacrifice—the Sun, light of consciousness—represents that light's death to keep the system looping. Slaves remain unconscious, blind to bars. Soul immortality, in this frame, is false identity persistence.

Not everyone agrees. Materialist responses arrive quickly: the solar system is heliocentric, Earth spherical, and astrophysicist Percy Seymour's hypothesis allows astral influences without rejecting physics. Deeper objections: Christ wasn't historical but a Gnostic construction; first-century had multiple self-proclaimed messiahs, as 'messiah' is just a word.

The crucified's identity also enters discussion: some argue, based on apocryphal gospels and historian Flavius Josephus's texts, that James was executed, while the one called Christ neither died nor rose. None of this resolves here; presenting it as certainty sells something.

A Flock Asking if It Is Being Shepherded

Underlying all is an uncomfortable suspicion: humans were created in a lab. The argument is anatomical. Appendicitis kills, backs fail, teeth fall, women need help giving birth, babies require years of care. No other animal seems so poorly adapted. Ingenuity, clothes, and toothbrushes compensate.

The most cited response: elites know nothing we couldn't learn if untrained. No superiority, only advantage. Their power rests on our belief that nothing can change. Comfortable, indeed.

The imaginary summit governing the world still has a design flaw: no signed organizational chart has ever been presented.