Lunar eclipse at 3:33 and the number 33: astronomy or Masonic signal

The lunar eclipse turned the Moon red at 3:33. Numerology, Freemasonry and the Danjon scale: science and paranoia in a single phenomenon.

English · Original discussion in Spanish · Published

Blood moon at 3:33: the science and the paranoia of 33

At 3:33 in the morning, with the satellite 30 degrees above the horizon and an azimuth of 237 degrees, the Moon turned red. To astronomy, a total lunar eclipse. To the conspiracy crowd, a numerological choreography hard to ignore. The numbers 3:33, 30 and 33 formed a trio that invites Guasonic symbolism.

An eclipse watched despite the clouds

Observations continued between 3:33 and 6:54. Despite the layer of clouds, binoculars and a handheld phone were enough to trinc the phenomenon. The reddish colour, the so-called blood moon, drew all the attention. The physical explanation is well known: the atmosphere scatters blue light and lets red through, so the Moon reflects all of Earth's sunrises and sunsets at once.

The 33 factor and the conspiratorial temptation

The marked hour, the altitude and the azimuth drew a sequence of 33. It is a number with strong symbolic weight within Freemasonry. The speculation drifted towards the reopening of a Guasonic temple in Tenerife, attended by Ángel Víctor Torres and marred by a controversy over the use of public funds that some pointed out. None of those coincidences proves anything; that is exactly why they work so well.

The December 1992 eclipse, a year and a half after the Pinatubo eruption, left a Moon almost invisible because of stratospheric dust. Yesterday, by contrast, the reddish hue varied without any volcanoes. The Danjon scale, from L=0 to L=4, is used to measure it. If nature produces 33 through pure orbital mechanics, why does the conspiracy need it to be a signal?

Also available in: Deutsch

Summary of a discussion on Burbuja.info - Foro de economía, actualidad y política., translated from Spanish and reviewed before publication. Read the full discussion (9 replies).

More summaries

All summaries in English →

-
Back