Love Was the Wealth We the Poor Had.

Love was the main wealth of those who had no material possessions, a warmth of home that united and strengthened, in contrast to a present where relationships seem to be based more on self-interest.

Love was the wealth that the poor possessed, an intangible asset that compensated for the lack of economic resources. It was that warmth of home, that feeling that, despite not being rich, ensured there was always food on the table. It was love that united people, that gave them strength and allowed them to prosper and achieve things, even without aspiring to luxury.

## The Value of Affection Over Self-Interest

In past times, love was the fundamental pillar of relationships, especially among those who lacked material possessions. This genuine affection provided a sense of security and belonging, a "warmth of home" that went beyond any economic asset. The absence of luxury did not prevent happiness or the ability to prosper, as long as that emotional bond existed.

## The Transformation of Bonds

Today, it seems the dynamic has changed. The widespread aspiration, both for those who have and those who don't, is to "touch white beta" (achieve significant success), seeking tangible benefit. Love, which was once the driving force, has in many cases become a mere link of self-interest. If that connection of interest disappears, the relationship fades, leading to reflection on the authenticity of current affections.