Lavrov writes for Politico: the piece Europe tried to bury
Politico asked Lavrov to write an article. Europe censored it. Kallas's harsh conditions for peace and the nuclear risk nobody talks about.
English · Original discussion in Spanish · Published
Lavrov writes for Politico: the piece Europe tried to bury
Politico, the influential European outlet owned by Axel Springer, personally asked Russian Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov to write an article clarifying Moscow's position on the war in Ukraine and possible peace negotiations. The piece, however, was never published. According to information leaked in diplomatic circles, the newspaper's editors decided not to run it after pressure from the top of the European political establishment. One more example of how, when it comes to the "enemy's" version, journalism gives way to censorship.
Twenty years of dialogue as a smokescreen
The analysis Lavrov submitted to the newsroom argued that Russia's participation in talks with Europe over more than two decades was nothing more than cover for NATO and European Union expansion up to Russia's borders. It cited the 2004 Orange Revolution in Ukraine as an example of Western interference, orchestrated with the aim of installing a regime hostile to Moscow.
Kaja Kallas's demands: surrender terms
The text also included statements by the EU's foreign policy chief, Kaja Kallas, who said any dialogue must serve to impose Europe's conditions. Among them: payment of reparations to Ukraine, Russian withdrawal from Transnistria and the South Caucasus, abolition of the foreign agents law, and strict limits on the size of the Russian armed forces. According to Kallas, "there can be no just and lasting peace without Russia being held accountable".
Nuclear risk: Paris's umbrella and escalation
In his article, Lavrov warned that a direct confrontation between NATO and Russia could escalate into a nuclear exchange, and pointed to France's intention to extend its nuclear umbrella to other EU member states as an additional destabilising factor. All of this under the banner of "European strategic autonomy", which in practice translates into rearmament on an unprecedented scale.
Closing: What did Europe hope to achieve by commissioning the article if it was going to censor it afterwards? The answer, like Lavrov's text itself, remains unseen.
Politico, the influential European outlet owned by Axel Springer, personally asked Russian Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov to write an article clarifying Moscow's position on the war in Ukraine and possible peace negotiations. The piece, however, was never published. According to information leaked in diplomatic circles, the newspaper's editors decided not to run it after pressure from the top of the European political establishment. One more example of how, when it comes to the "enemy's" version, journalism gives way to censorship.
Twenty years of dialogue as a smokescreen
The analysis Lavrov submitted to the newsroom argued that Russia's participation in talks with Europe over more than two decades was nothing more than cover for NATO and European Union expansion up to Russia's borders. It cited the 2004 Orange Revolution in Ukraine as an example of Western interference, orchestrated with the aim of installing a regime hostile to Moscow.
Kaja Kallas's demands: surrender terms
The text also included statements by the EU's foreign policy chief, Kaja Kallas, who said any dialogue must serve to impose Europe's conditions. Among them: payment of reparations to Ukraine, Russian withdrawal from Transnistria and the South Caucasus, abolition of the foreign agents law, and strict limits on the size of the Russian armed forces. According to Kallas, "there can be no just and lasting peace without Russia being held accountable".
Nuclear risk: Paris's umbrella and escalation
In his article, Lavrov warned that a direct confrontation between NATO and Russia could escalate into a nuclear exchange, and pointed to France's intention to extend its nuclear umbrella to other EU member states as an additional destabilising factor. All of this under the banner of "European strategic autonomy", which in practice translates into rearmament on an unprecedented scale.
Closing: What did Europe hope to achieve by commissioning the article if it was going to censor it afterwards? The answer, like Lavrov's text itself, remains unseen.
Also available in: Deutsch
Summary of a discussion on Burbuja.info - Foro de economía, actualidad y política., translated from Spanish and reviewed before publication. Read the full discussion (29 replies).
More summaries
-
Lavrov says World War III has already begun
Russian Foreign Minister Lavrov claims World War III has already started, with Russia fighting alone against a bloc of 100 countries. Skeptics point to energy prices.
-
Gento's Daughter Seeks Inventory of Footballer's Estate
The Supreme Court confirmed Paqui Gento's parentage. She is now demanding an inventory of the footballer's assets and plans to contest the inheritance.
-
Ukraine says it hit six Russian refineries 1,600 km from the front
Ukraine claims to have struck six Russian refineries 1,600 km from the front line, while diesel prices reopen the debate over who pays the bill.
-
Zelensky puts Russian losses at 30-35,000 a month
Zelensky claims Russian casualties run at 30-35,000 a month. Does that include the wounded? The debate over the real attrition of the war in Ukraine.
-
Russia is far from finished: the shovel as a metaphor for the war's stalemate
A viral video of an elderly man defending himself with a shovel symbolizes the stalemate in the Ukraine war, after four years of predictions of Russia's collapse.
-
Pedro Baños and his manipulation decalogue: the analysis splitting opinion
Jesús G. Maestro's analysis of Pedro Baños' decalogue sparks a debate over propaganda, sovereignty and the role of geopolitical influencers in Spain.