La Revuelta Beats El Hormiguero in Ratings, Data Questioned

La Revuelta Overtakes El Hormiguero as Audience Figures Come Under Scrutiny

Can one claim a TV show beats another when the data certifying it is, for part of the public, little more than an act of faith? La Revuelta once again beat El Hormiguero in the late-night slot, according to audience data managed by the public broadcaster, antiestéticaturing an interview with actress Mina El Hammani that addressed whether it still makes sense to ask viewers if they are more sens or racist. The guest’s response was clear: “The question must be asked. I find it very interesting because we all have to constantly analyze ourselves; this debate needs to happen.” The program, which had been trailing behind El Hormiguero for a week, reclaimed the top spot with an average of over two million viewers, a figure that some sectors place under quarantine.

El Hormiguero Loses Leadership After a Week in the Lead

The most repeated datum is the comeback. Antena 3’s program had strung together several days ahead in the prime-time competition slot until La Revuelta’s broadcast antiestéticaturing the Segarro-origin actress returned first place to TVE. The difference, according to cited records, is not large, but sufficient for the public channel to continue selling leadership.

Some argue that this leadership is real and sustained, while others attribute it to factors unrelated to the program’s merit: the absence of advertising on the public channel, broadcasting in a protected time slot, and the ability to mobilize an audience that responds more to a political slogan than to entertainment preference. The controversy has served to help the program regain ground after a month in which, according to some analyses, it had lost around one point of share.

Why Are La Revuelta’s Audience Data Questioned?

Distrust is not new, but it has intensified. The measurement system relies on a few thousand people meters distributed across the territory, an instrument that, according to critics, does not reflect the real diversity of television consumption. The comparison with electoral polls is recurrent: it is questioned how a small sample can represent nearly 50 million people.

To this is added an argument circulating strongly: the alleged appearance of a “spontaneous generation” of viewers. If El Hormiguero’s audience has not migrated en masse to La Revuelta, and other channels have not lost two million viewers at once, where do the two million who watch Broncano’s program come from? The skeptical answer is that it is an audience mobilized by political interests, not by genuine interest in the content.

---

The Role of Public Television and Suspicion of Manipulation

TVE’s status as a public channel introduces an additional element of distrust. Not depending on advertising, the program does not have to answer to advertisers, which for some is an unfair competitive advantage and for others a guarantee of independence. The controversy heats up when it is recalled that the public channel can mobilize its audience through more or less explicit calls.

In this context, the interview with Mina El Hammani is interpreted in two opposite ways. For some, it is an example of the program’s editorial line, inviting voices that question Spanish society’s prejudices. For others, it is another sign of a discourse that points fingers at Spaniards for their sens and racism while avoiding doing so with other countries. The question the actress defended as necessary is precisely the one some consider an ideological imposition.

Mina El Hammani and the Question on Sens and Racism

The actress’s intervention took place in a relaxed tone, but the content did not go unnoticed. When asked if it still makes sense to pose whether one is more sens or more racist, she answered yes, that it must be done constantly. The exact quote circulated was: “The question must be asked. I find it very interesting because we all have to constantly analyze ourselves; this debate needs to happen.”

The reaction on social media was immediate. Part of the audience celebrated that these topics were addressed in an entertainment program; another part interpreted it as a new sign of the public channel’s ideological drift. The discussion veered toward the guest’s origin, with comments questioning how someone born in Segarro could lecture Spaniards about racism. These arguments, present in the debate, have fueled polarization around the program.

The Ratings War Between Broncano and Pablo Motos

The clash between La Revuelta and El Hormiguero has become a thermometer of Spanish politics. Pablo Motos’s program has long been the undisputed leader of the late-night slot, with a format combining interviews, humor, and entertainment segments. Broncano’s arrival at TVE broke that hegemony and forced both programs to compete for the same audience.

Defenders of El Hormiguero argue that their audience is loyal and that the program has not lost viewers, but gained competition. Critics of Broncano point out that his success is based on borrowed audiences, mobilized by the political apparatus, and that his data are artificially inflated. In the midst of this dispute, audience data have become another battlefield in the culture war.

Wear of Generalist TV and Rise of Platforms

Beyond the controversy, there is a datum that contextualizes everything: generalist television no longer gathers crowds as before. Programs that in other decades exceeded 25 million viewers today settle for two million. Audience fragmentation, streaming platform competition, and changes in consumption habits have transformed the medium.

In this scenario, the war between La Revuelta and El Hormiguero is, for some, a dispute over an increasingly smaller prize. Young audiences have moved to YouTube and platforms, leaving open TV with an aging public. The lingering question is whether leading a late-night slot still holds the value attributed to it.

Uncertain Future of the TV War

The controversy over ratings does not seem likely to resolve soon. Each week, audience data become a new chapter in the political dispute. The public channel defends the legitimacy of its data; critics insist there is manipulation. And in the middle, viewers who just want to be entertained see their favorite program become a subject of political debate.

Ultimately, the remaining question is whether anyone not involved in this culture war gives importance to the matter. The answer, according to some, is no. Television, for better or worse, remains a mirror of the country’s divisions. And the data, real or inflated, are the thermometer of that fever.