You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly. You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
Kissinger's nuclear veto on Spain: fact or myth?
Kissinger allegedly threatened to back ETA if Franco refused to abandon the atomic bomb. Myth or real pressure? Facts and context on Spain's nuclear program in the 1970s.
In the early 1970s, Henry Kissinger is said to have issued a direct threat: if Spain developed atomic weapons, the White House would support ETA and Canary Islands independence movements to destabilize the regime. The warning has haunted historians of Spain's nuclear program ever since, caught between hard facts and corridor rumors.
An atomic flirtation with a name attached
Franco's regime spent the 1960s investing in centrifuge technology and the uranium mine at Saelices el Chico (Salamanca). Scientists trained under agreements with the United States were working on an experimental reactor. According to leaked documents —though never declassified— Spain could have produced up to 28 bombs in a single year had it pressed ahead.
American pressure: from diplomacy to coercion
Kissinger, then Secretary of State, acted in his trademark "geopolitical predator" style. He did not stop at pressure: he forced Spain into the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty (NPT) and, according to some sources, threatened to aid ETA and the Movement for the Self-Determination and Independence of the Canary Islands Archipelago (MPAIAC) if the project stayed alive. The strategy fit the doctrine of containing any small country that might upset the Cold War board.
Paranoia or calculated strategy?
The figure of 28 bombs in a year has never been officially confirmed. It is usually dismissed as a "CIA corridor rumor." Recent historiography, however, confirms that Franco's regime did have military nuclear plans. The irony is that Kissinger had already done the same to far closer allies: he blocked Britain from keeping its independent atomic capability.
Was Spain a real threat to Washington, or merely an excuse to shut the tap on an awkward country? Almost half a century later, the answer remains buried in classified archives.
Summary of a discussion on Burbuja.info - Foro de economía, actualidad y política., translated from Spanish and reviewed before publication.
Read the full discussion (39 replies).
Despite the extreme violence of their battles, the Romans made no progress in anatomy because of a religious taboo banning human dissection. Galen had to rely on animals instead.
Hannibal Barca, the military genius who crushed Rome at Cannae, never managed to destroy the Republic. Logistics, lack of support and Roman resilience explain why.
A viral video of students in Alcoy, Spain, preparing for the PAU university entrance exam shows them all speaking Spanish. The row over the city's real everyday language erupts.
A recurring myth denies the African American contribution to the US, but history documents African civilizations, slave labor on infrastructure, and a lasting cultural legacy.