Jordi Wild: "Do we have to stay in a country that solves things like this?"

Jordi Wild has posted a rhetorical question on X criticising how problems are solved in Spain and linking it to the growth of the independence movement. The message does not specify which case it refers to.

Communicator **Jordi Wild** has published a message on the social network X posing a direct question: "Do we have to stay in a country that solves things like this?". The post adds a second part that connects this way of acting with the rise of the independence movement: "Then they wonder why there are more and more independence supporters every day". The text is accompanied by the hashtag **#AVotarSí** and a link to a video.

## A question with no specific case

The message does not specify which particular situation prompted the reflection. The hashtag **#AVotarSí** refers to the debate over the Catalan vote, but the text does not detail any specific facts or mention institutions, court rulings or specific political episodes. The post works as a generic reaction to a way of handling conflicts, not as a documented complaint about a specific case.

That absence of an explicit reference is significant. A reader coming to the message without prior context cannot know what "like this" refers to. The question remains open and allows for different interpretations depending on what each person has in mind.

## The link to the independence movement

The second sentence of the message establishes a causal relationship between political management and the growth of support for independence. It is an opinion-based statement, not a verified fact. The text provides no figures on support for independence, nor polls, nor election results backing that trend.

The hashtag **#AVotarSí** places the message within the debate on the right to decide. The author does not develop the argument beyond those two sentences, so the post operates more as a statement of position than as an analysis.

## The reach of a short message

The post trinc the usual format of social media reactions: a short sentence, a hashtag and an attached video. It includes no data, sources or verifiable references. Its informational value is limited; its value as a sample of opinion is high.

Anyone reading the message should be clear that it is a personal opinion expressed on a social network, not journalistic reporting. The claims about the rise of the independence movement are not accompanied by any evidence in the text itself.