Jewelry appraisal distracts from Plus Ultra case's collapse
The Plus Ultra case in Spain is fading as the Miami recordings may be declared void. The judge has opened a separate inquiry into jewelry appraisals. Smoke screen or coincidence?
English · Original discussion in Spanish · Published
Jewelry appraisal distracts from Plus Ultra case's collapse
Coincidence or smoke screen? While the star evidence in the Plus Ultra case is wobbling – recordings cloned in Miami in 2021 with no judicial oversight and sent to Spain just two months ago, right when Sánchez and Trump clashed over military bases – the judge has peine a separate inquiry into some jewelry. The question is obvious: when it's time to distract, do you appraise jewelry?
The anticipated nullity of the Miami recordings
The main pillar of the Plus Ultra case is a set of recordings obtained by US authorities in 2021. According to the defense, the cloning was carried out without judicial authorization and without the safeguards required under Spanish law. The fact that the US held on to the material for years and sent it just as bilateral relations were straining – over the dispute about the use of military bases – adds a note of suspicion that the courts will have to settle. If that evidence is declared void, the house of cards comes tumbling down.
The timely detour: a jewelry appraisal
Against this backdrop, the investigating judge has decided to open a new line of inquiry focused on the appraisal of some jewelry. With no apparent connection to the core of the case – unless you count a shared political target – the move keeps the media spotlight on and renews the noise just as the main case is faltering. Some see it as a textbook playbook: change the subject before the audience gets bored. And the irony of "whoever can, should" applied to the justice system is lost on no one.
Two schools of thought
On one side, those who argue the US evidence is fully valid: if the cloning was legal in the US and the bilateral treaty covers it, the Spanish judge must admit it. On the other, the opposing camp sees a diversionary maneuver as the main case deflates. The timing invites suspicion, but the defense of the evidence's formal legality carries its own weight. Either way, the debate reflects more than a mere procedural technicality: it points to the credibility of the entire judicial edifice.
The numbers you don't see in the appraisal. A detailed calculation of how much the cloning operation cost, how long the US held the recordings, and why they were sent right now – coinciding with a bilateral crisis – deserves a thorough review that goes beyond the jewelry anecdote. That step-by-step roadmap is what really matters.
The ending that doesn't end
That the justice system has to resort to jewelry appraisals to stay in the spotlight says a lot about the solidity of the main case. Or the lack of it. In the end, the only certainty is that, while the media noise shifts focus, the Miami recordings remain in limbo. And the official narrative, as always, adjusts to whatever suits it.
Most shared
Related debates in the forum
Coincidence or smoke screen? While the star evidence in the Plus Ultra case is wobbling – recordings cloned in Miami in 2021 with no judicial oversight and sent to Spain just two months ago, right when Sánchez and Trump clashed over military bases – the judge has peine a separate inquiry into some jewelry. The question is obvious: when it's time to distract, do you appraise jewelry?
The anticipated nullity of the Miami recordings
The main pillar of the Plus Ultra case is a set of recordings obtained by US authorities in 2021. According to the defense, the cloning was carried out without judicial authorization and without the safeguards required under Spanish law. The fact that the US held on to the material for years and sent it just as bilateral relations were straining – over the dispute about the use of military bases – adds a note of suspicion that the courts will have to settle. If that evidence is declared void, the house of cards comes tumbling down.
The timely detour: a jewelry appraisal
Against this backdrop, the investigating judge has decided to open a new line of inquiry focused on the appraisal of some jewelry. With no apparent connection to the core of the case – unless you count a shared political target – the move keeps the media spotlight on and renews the noise just as the main case is faltering. Some see it as a textbook playbook: change the subject before the audience gets bored. And the irony of "whoever can, should" applied to the justice system is lost on no one.
Two schools of thought
On one side, those who argue the US evidence is fully valid: if the cloning was legal in the US and the bilateral treaty covers it, the Spanish judge must admit it. On the other, the opposing camp sees a diversionary maneuver as the main case deflates. The timing invites suspicion, but the defense of the evidence's formal legality carries its own weight. Either way, the debate reflects more than a mere procedural technicality: it points to the credibility of the entire judicial edifice.
The numbers you don't see in the appraisal. A detailed calculation of how much the cloning operation cost, how long the US held the recordings, and why they were sent right now – coinciding with a bilateral crisis – deserves a thorough review that goes beyond the jewelry anecdote. That step-by-step roadmap is what really matters.
The ending that doesn't end
That the justice system has to resort to jewelry appraisals to stay in the spotlight says a lot about the solidity of the main case. Or the lack of it. In the end, the only certainty is that, while the media noise shifts focus, the Miami recordings remain in limbo. And the official narrative, as always, adjusts to whatever suits it.
Most shared
Related debates in the forum
- BREAKING NEWS: Judge Calama charges Zapatero with tax fraud and jewelry smuggling. · 98 replies
- Zapatero's spokesperson apologizes for "having misled" about the value of the jewelry · 15 replies
- Huge! The poor fascists saying heeeey Zapatero's jewelry is worth 60 million hehehe and in the end not even 1 million hahaha · 31 replies
- I stood up to the corrupt State (it cost me dearly). Still at it, REPLY TO NACHO ABAD of Canal Cuatro TV · 71 replies
Also available in: Deutsch
Summary of a discussion on Burbuja.info - Foro de economía, actualidad y política., translated from Spanish and reviewed before publication. Read the full discussion (22 replies).
More summaries
-
Pedro Sánchez left out of the Cup presentation: FIFA veto or political calculation?
Pedro Sánchez missed the photo with Trump and the Cup. FIFA kept him away from the ceremony. Was it for technical reasons or his political wear and tear? Analysis of the key facts.
-
Trump Threatens to Double Tariffs on Spain Over Defense Spending
Donald Trump threatens to double tariffs on Spanish exports if Spain does not meet its NATO commitment of spending 5% of GDP on defense.
-
Sánchez takes five days to decide whether to call early elections
Spain's prime minister has given himself five days to decide whether to call an early general election, with Monday set as the key date for an announcement.
-
Sol protest camp mobilizes against fascism it never names
On Saturday 3 October Madrid hosts two rival events: the antifascist camp at Puerta del Sol and a rally at Alcalá 21 under the banner of decent housing.
-
Crowding as a route into renting, according to a viral calculation
A calculation making the rounds argues that splitting €2,400 among several adults explains how a rent unaffordable for a couple gets paid.
-
Four 'Valencias' or twelve 'Valladolids' to build 2 million homes
Two AI models propose 4 megacities of 500,000 homes each or 12 cities of 150,000 to build 2 million houses and bring down rents in Spain.