Is running just 'penny-pinching in disguise'? One forum user wonders
Running is pitched as free leisure compared with a 25-euro gym membership, but some spend over 1,000 euros on gear and their knees pay the price
English · Original discussion in Spanish · Published
Running is all the rage: the savings are up for debate and your knees end up paying for it
At midday, in the full heat, or at eleven at night. Between those two windows, more and more runners are showing up on seafront promenades and neighbourhood streets, and that detail — more than any licence statistics — is what has sparked the suspicion: is running a sporting hobby or a low-cost pastime dressed up as a trend? The discussion mixes gear prices, peer pressure and joint health, and nobody has settled the balance.
The budget-friendly version has its logic. Once you own the equipment, the hours of exercise are free. Compared with the gym, which in one specific case comes to 25 euros a month, going out for a run requires no fee. The catch is that this saving evaporates as soon as the hobbyist enters the gear circuit, and there the numbers stop being pretty.
Is running a real saving or a disguised expense?
It depends on how you approach it. Some argue that any well-ventilated shoe is enough for two or three half-hour runs a week, and that the initial cost can be literally zero. That's the penny-pincher side of the story. The other side, according to one forum user, belongs to those who no longer go out for a run but to measure themselves: devices worth over 1,000 euros between watch and phone, 150-euro shoes and another 300 on cap, sunglasses, T-shirt and shorts. On top of that, according to the same user, every weekend fun run costs around 10 euros.
With those figures on the table, the label of budget sport is, at best, incomplete for those who take that view.
Why do runners' knees get injured?
Here things get serious. One forum user with two damaged knees, plantar fasciitis and a dodgy ankle blames his injuries on running on hard surfaces. The explanation runners themselves offer comes down to the surface and to gait type — overpronators and supinators shouldn't wear the same shoes — and also to body weight: above 75 kilos, one runner warns, cushioning stops being a luxury and becomes joint protection.
The key warning is age. At 20 or 30 there's no pain; afterwards, the body sends the bill for every sport done badly. Nobody offers a magic solution — least of all from a bar stool.
Cycling, swimming and the urge to run flat out
Against the constant impact, the alternatives are gaining ground. An old bike rescued from oblivion can be got roadworthy for 60 euros — inner tubes, tyres, brake pads and tools — and an ordinary 300-euro bike works fine for 25 to 40-kilometre routes. Swimming boasts minimal gear: swimsuit, cap and goggles, with models from 7 euros at big-box stores, though prescription goggles climb to 40 and in Spain people have paid double.
The only point with no consensus is calorie burn. Some maintain that thirty minutes of all-out swimming burns far more than running; others reply that no exercise burns more than running. Nobody settles it.
Herd fad or endorphin addiction?
Two accounts coexist about the origin of the trend. The first is social: fewer smokers, less bar-room chatter, and a crowd that moves wherever the majority goes — a herd argument with nothing behind it but observation. The second is chemical: the brain releases endorphins during exertion, and some describe skipping the routine as a guilt that feels physically bad.
Between the two lies a sight that irritates more than a few: the one who charges up the hill at full estimulante ilegal, eyes on the ground, and proclaims they're enjoying the scenery.
The summer runner and the weekend races
Not everyone crowding the pavements does it out of conviction. Part of the phenomenon is put down to seasonality: those who only take up running in summer, according to some forum users. Add to that a growing supply of fun runs in any given town, with paid entry, that push people to stretch distances and paces without improving their technique. It's the suspicion that business is driving things more than health.
The only measurable thing in all this is the bill. Equipment can stay at zero or shoot past a thousand euros, the gym fee is dodged but the shoes wear out, and the joints — those of anyone over 75 kilos running daily on asphalt — don't appear on any spreadsheet.
At midday, in the full heat, or at eleven at night. Between those two windows, more and more runners are showing up on seafront promenades and neighbourhood streets, and that detail — more than any licence statistics — is what has sparked the suspicion: is running a sporting hobby or a low-cost pastime dressed up as a trend? The discussion mixes gear prices, peer pressure and joint health, and nobody has settled the balance.
The budget-friendly version has its logic. Once you own the equipment, the hours of exercise are free. Compared with the gym, which in one specific case comes to 25 euros a month, going out for a run requires no fee. The catch is that this saving evaporates as soon as the hobbyist enters the gear circuit, and there the numbers stop being pretty.
Is running a real saving or a disguised expense?
It depends on how you approach it. Some argue that any well-ventilated shoe is enough for two or three half-hour runs a week, and that the initial cost can be literally zero. That's the penny-pincher side of the story. The other side, according to one forum user, belongs to those who no longer go out for a run but to measure themselves: devices worth over 1,000 euros between watch and phone, 150-euro shoes and another 300 on cap, sunglasses, T-shirt and shorts. On top of that, according to the same user, every weekend fun run costs around 10 euros.
With those figures on the table, the label of budget sport is, at best, incomplete for those who take that view.
Why do runners' knees get injured?
Here things get serious. One forum user with two damaged knees, plantar fasciitis and a dodgy ankle blames his injuries on running on hard surfaces. The explanation runners themselves offer comes down to the surface and to gait type — overpronators and supinators shouldn't wear the same shoes — and also to body weight: above 75 kilos, one runner warns, cushioning stops being a luxury and becomes joint protection.
The key warning is age. At 20 or 30 there's no pain; afterwards, the body sends the bill for every sport done badly. Nobody offers a magic solution — least of all from a bar stool.
Cycling, swimming and the urge to run flat out
Against the constant impact, the alternatives are gaining ground. An old bike rescued from oblivion can be got roadworthy for 60 euros — inner tubes, tyres, brake pads and tools — and an ordinary 300-euro bike works fine for 25 to 40-kilometre routes. Swimming boasts minimal gear: swimsuit, cap and goggles, with models from 7 euros at big-box stores, though prescription goggles climb to 40 and in Spain people have paid double.
The only point with no consensus is calorie burn. Some maintain that thirty minutes of all-out swimming burns far more than running; others reply that no exercise burns more than running. Nobody settles it.
Herd fad or endorphin addiction?
Two accounts coexist about the origin of the trend. The first is social: fewer smokers, less bar-room chatter, and a crowd that moves wherever the majority goes — a herd argument with nothing behind it but observation. The second is chemical: the brain releases endorphins during exertion, and some describe skipping the routine as a guilt that feels physically bad.
Between the two lies a sight that irritates more than a few: the one who charges up the hill at full estimulante ilegal, eyes on the ground, and proclaims they're enjoying the scenery.
The summer runner and the weekend races
Not everyone crowding the pavements does it out of conviction. Part of the phenomenon is put down to seasonality: those who only take up running in summer, according to some forum users. Add to that a growing supply of fun runs in any given town, with paid entry, that push people to stretch distances and paces without improving their technique. It's the suspicion that business is driving things more than health.
The only measurable thing in all this is the bill. Equipment can stay at zero or shoot past a thousand euros, the gym fee is dodged but the shoes wear out, and the joints — those of anyone over 75 kilos running daily on asphalt — don't appear on any spreadsheet.
Also available in: Deutsch
Summary of a discussion on Burbuja.info - Foro de economía, actualidad y política., translated from Spanish and reviewed before publication. Read the full discussion (100 replies).
More summaries
-
Extreme Cardio and Questioned Longevity
Analysis of the link between extreme cardio and premature aging in athletes. Is aerobic overtraining a real longevity risk?
-
Budget running shoes: own-brand or Nike?
Running shoes for under 70 euros: Aldi own-brand or Nike on sale? We look at quality, price and the consumer's dilemma.
-
Decathlon's 12.99 euro sneakers: false economy?
Decathlon's cheapest sneakers promise two years of daily wear. Are they worth it compared to Lidl's 17 euro pair with gel? We look at the value for money.
-
Aging gracefully: surgery vs. genetics at 64
Madonna and Susanna Hoffs, both 64, illustrate two opposite ways of facing aging: surgery and gym versus habits and good spirits.
-
Four Roses: the budget bourbon split by its sweetness
Four Roses divides opinion over its sweetness and supermarket price. US law guarantees it is genuine bourbon, but the palate decides whether the value holds up.
-
Williams Ice Blue stick: why it's vanishing and where to find it
Users report that the Williams Ice Blue stick shrinks and dries out; they suspect a redesign without an O-ring. It's getting harder to find in stores.