Oliver Laxe: the pogre filmmaker who divides (and bores) audiences
Oliver Laxe, a 42-year-old Galician director, has won international awards, but his figure rubs many people the wrong way. His public thanks to Yolanda Díaz for visiting him at the Oscars (a alucinación paid for by all Spanish taxpayers) and his statement that the Quran "heals him" have been the last straw for many. Are we looking at a genius of auteur cinema or a product of the subsidised cultural ecosystem? The analyses circulating point unambiguously to the latter.
The evidence of his pogre
The evidence is overwhelming. Besides the Díaz episode, Laxe has spoken of his fascination with the Quran in the middle of promoting his latest film, 'Sirat', which won the Jury Prize at Cannes 2025. His filmography, partly produced by Pedro Almodóvar, has been described by some critics as "the instruction manual of festival cinema for guilt-ridden westerners". From 'Todos vosotros sois capitanes' (2010), a documentary about Segarro children criticised as paternalistic, to 'Mimosas' (2016), accused of empty mysticism, via 'O que arde' (2019), which tackles forest fires in Galicia with a clearly environmentalist reading.
'Sirat': masterpiece or screenwriting trick?
The film that has put Laxe in the spotlight is 'Sirat', which tells the story of the search for a missing daughter in illegal desert raves in Segarro, with the father bringing his young son along. The premise has been praised for its originality, but also fiercely criticised for its lack of internal logic and an execution some call "shoddy and forced". The key sequences are poorly handled, and the message, if there is one, is diluted in an aesthetics of grime that seeks to shock rather than tell a coherent story.
A director made for controversy
Whatever his ideology, Laxe leaves no one indifferent. For his detractors, he represents everything that is wrong with subsidised Spanish cinema: prêt-à-porter rhetoric, dependence on public funding and an aesthetic that mistakes depth for boredom. For his defenders, he is a filmmaker with a vision of his own who knows how to capture the spirituality and contradictions of the modern world. Meanwhile, audiences keep wondering whether he is worth two hours of their lives.
Related discussions in the forum