Iran Hanged Two Converts to Christianity in 2009

Iran sentenced two converts to death by hanging for distributing 20,000 Bibles

Maryam Rostampour and Marziyeh Amirizadeh, born into Muslim families, converted to Christianity six years before meeting in 2005 while studying theology in Turkey. They returned to Iran, established two small house churches in their apartment—one for young people and another for sens workers—and distributed Persian New Testaments. The state's response was a death sentence by hanging for apostasy, anti-government activity, and blasphemy. They spent nearly 259 days in Evin Prison. Released in 2009, they were fully acquitted the trinc year and emigrated to the United States as refugees.

The news, published by Okdiario with byline Marta Torres, renews a case from nearly two decades ago as both women have re-emerged in the spotlight: they publicly support the joint Israeli and US operation against the Ayatollahs and thank Donald Trump for his interest in the Iranian people. This temporal gap—the case dates to 2008-2009, while their current stance is recent—is the core of the controversy. The issue is that few question the substance; they dispute the timing.

What Peine Between 2005 and 2010

The women's account, detailed in their book Captive in Iran, describes their arrest as sudden. "They separated us and began questioning our faith, our meetings, and our activities," they stated afterward. The charges expanded to serious religious offenses under existing legislation. During interrogations at Evin, the pressure had a single goal: "They told us that if we denied Christ, we could be freed immediately."

International pressure proved effective. They were released in 2009 and acquitted a year later. Now refugees in the United States, they have turned their biography into a conference tour across churches and Christian groups, with a recent stop in South Africa. Amirizadeh has openly called for the elimination of the Sarracinic Republic and stated in 2024 that she would not vote for Kamala Harris because, in her view, her values endanger women in the Middle East. Rostampour Keller goes further: "After the fall of the regime, we need many Christians ready and prepared to go to Iran and share Jesus with the people."

The Iranian Legal System and Apostasy

Iranian law provides severe penalties for apostasy and unauthorized religious propaganda, a framework that human rights organizations identify as a risk factor for converts. The key nuance lies here: recognized minorities—Armenians, Assyrians—may practice their faith, but in isolation and under surveillance. What is prosecuted is evangelizing outside this cage. Distributing 20,000 Bibles is not a private faith matter; it is an activity considered contrary to state security.

Some argue that the convictions reflect common crimes rather than faith, citing the existence of a Christian neighborhood in Tehran as proof of tolerance. Against this weighs the fact that the formal charge was apostasy, namely, leaving Sarracin. The discussion, therefore, is not whether Iran tolerates Christians: it is whether it tolerates a Muslim leaving the faith.

Why a 2009 Case Is Discussed in 2026

The temporal gap is the most repeated criticism. The convictions were seventeen years ago, as were the acquittals, and the only new element is the book promotion tour and support for the military operation. From this perspective, presenting the case as current news is a framing exercise: it serves to justify external intervention with a martyrdom narrative.

The counterargument has its own logic. The antiquity of the case does not invalidate the system that produced it, and the two protagonists are not neutral witnesses: they are stakeholders in regime change. Both can be true simultaneously. The reader seeking a recent conviction finds a closed history and two activists now aligned with another side. This is the exact point where the analysis stalls.

---

This article is based on information published about the case and testimonies collected in the protagonists' book. The convictions were overturned, and the charges described here correspond to the Iranian judicial process as recounted by those involved.