The person selling the insurance and the one assuming the risk are not the same. That is the key that breaks the comparison with Mercadona: there, the product is a can of chickpeas; here, it is a promise of coverage that only someone with technical reserves can legally sustain. The insurer provides the capital, calculates the probability of the claim, and answers with its balance sheet. The seller, exclusive agent, or broker, does not risk their own money: they earn a commission for placing the policy and another for each renewal.
Exclusive agent, broker, and the myth of the self-employed
The initial confusion is reasonable: at Mercadona, whoever sells is Mercadona. In insurance, whoever sells may be a self-employed person who risks nothing. The exclusive agent is tied to a single company; the broker can offer several. Neither responds with their personal assets if the claim arrives. That function belongs to the insurer, which requires administrative authorization and technical reserves to operate.
Why do not all companies sell directly, like phone and web insurers? Because placing insurance requires going door to door, calling, persisting, and enduring rejection. This dirty work is outsourced to a commercial network that only earns if it sells. Zero fixed cost for the company.
Commissions, quotas, and the Mercedes as mirage
Some argue that brokers are making a fortune with commissions for each policy placed, without needing specific training. Against this is the argument that most of this commercial network does not live from renewals, but from acquiring new clients every month. Hence the sales quotas: if you do not reach the minimum, out you go.
This system pushes sales to relatives, friends, and acquaintances before strangers. The classic "I am doing you a favor" which is actually a quota that must be covered. The parallel with NGO fundraisers is inevitable: the first month you earn insurance, the second only if you have brought in members.
Can you live from this without a contact network?
The uncomfortable answer is that the contact network is the real asset. Whoever does not have it, stays out or barely survives. Whoever has it, places policies among acquaintances and then expands. Specific training, according to those who know the sector, is secondary compared to the ability to persuade and the phone book.
The business, in summary, has two layers: the one risking capital and the one only risking time. The first earns premiums; the second, commissions. Confusing them is what makes the question "how is the insurance business going?" remain without a clear answer.
What does not quite add up is the scale. If the business is so easy and so lucrative, why is turnover in commercial networks so high? The prediction with reservations: as long as the monthly quota exists, there will continue to be those who sell insurance to their brother-in-law. And the brother-in-law, probably, will continue to sign.
Summary of a discussion on Burbuja.info - Foro de economía, actualidad y política., translated from Spanish and reviewed before publication.
Read the full discussion (16 replies).
RTVE will close 2024 with 34 million euros in losses and requests SEPI to activate its 38.3 million euro reserve fund. The president cuts his salary and imposes 20% cuts on executives.
Total blackouts, empty state stores for over three years, and retirees earning $3 a month: the Cuban economy survives on remittances and international begging.